ArticleHuman brain mapping2020
Primary auditory cortex representation of fear-conditioned musical sounds.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural mechanisms of fear memory precision and generalization: from auditory cortex to amygdala.Translational psychiatry · 2026Review
- Psychophysiological Outcome Responses in Human Pavlovian Fear Conditioning: A Prediction Error Analysis.Psychophysiology · 2026Article
- Psychoacoustic and Archeoacoustic nature of ancient Aztec skull whistles.Communications psychology · 2024Article
- Live music stimulates the affective brain and emotionally entrains listeners in real time.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Cerebral cortex functional reorganization in preschool children with congenital sensorineural hearing loss: a resting-state fMRI study.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- The nature and neurobiology of fear and anxiety: State of the science and opportunities for accelerating discovery.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2023Review
- Sensing fear: fast and precise threat evaluation in human sensory cortex.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2023Review
- Pattern analysis of neuroimaging data reveals novel insights on threat learning and extinction in humans.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2022Review
- Pattern differentiation and tuning shift in human sensory cortex underlie long-term threat memory.Current biology : CB · 2022Article
- The past, present, and future of selection history.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021Review
- Primary auditory cortex representation of fear-conditioned musical sounds.Human brain mapping · 2020Article
- Activation in human auditory cortex in relation to the loudness and unpleasantness of low-frequency and infrasound stimuli.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Auditory cortex is required for discriminative fear conditioning beyond the classical amygdala microcircuit, but its precise role is unknown. It has previously been suggested that Heschl's gyrus, which includes primary auditory cortex (A1), but also other auditory areas, encodes threat predictions during presentation of conditioned stimuli (CS) consisting of monophones, or frequency sweeps. The latter resemble natural prosody and contain discriminative spectro-temporal information. Here, we use functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in humans to address CS encoding in A1 for stimuli that contain only spectral but no temporal discriminative information. Two musical chords (complex) or two monophone tones (simple) were presented in a signaled reinforcement context (reinforced CS+ and nonreinforced CS-), or in a different context without reinforcement (neutral sounds, NS1 and NS2), with an incidental sound detection task. CS/US association encoding was quantified by the increased discriminability of BOLD patterns evoked by CS+/CS-, compared to NS pairs with similar physical stimulus differences and task demands. A1 was defined on a single-participant level and based on individual anatomy. We find that in A1, discriminability of CS+/CS- was higher than for NS1/NS2. This representation of unconditioned stimulus (US) prediction was of comparable magnitude for both types of sounds. We did not observe such encoding outside A1. Different from frequency sweeps investigated previously, musical chords did not share representations of US prediction with monophone sounds. To summarize, our findings suggest decodable representation of US predictions in A1, for various types of CS, including musical chords that contain no temporal discriminative information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.