Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31663185›Full record

ArticlePsycho-oncology2020

Depressive symptoms, neuroticism, and participation in breast and cervical cancer screening: Cross-sectional and prospective evidence from UK Biobank.

Claire L Niedzwiedz, Kathryn A Robb, Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi, Jill P Pell, Daniel J Smith

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psycho-oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Protocol for the Pilot Study of Group Video Yogic Breathing App in Breast Cancer Survivors.International journal of AAYUSH and traditional medicine · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Claire L NiedzwiedzInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6133-4168
Kathryn A RobbInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1672-0411
Srinivasa Vittal KatikireddiInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Jill P PellInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Daniel J SmithInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
University of Glasgow · GBMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit · GB

Funding

British Heart FoundationChief Scientist Office SCAF/15/02Chief Scientist Office SPHSU13Chief Scientist Office SPHSU15Chief Scientist Office SPHSU17Department of HealthMedical Research Council MC_PC_17217Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/13Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/15Medical Research Council MR/R024774/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the cross-sectional and prospective associations between depressive symptoms, neuroticism, and participation in breast and cervical screening in the UK.

methodsWomen in the UK Biobank cohort with complete data who were eligible for breast cancer screening (aged 50-70 years, N = 143 461) and/or cervical screening (<65 years, N = 141 753) at baseline recruitment (2006-2010) and those with follow-up data (2014-2019) were identified (N = 11 050 and N = 9780 for breast and cervical screening). Depressive symptoms and neuroticism were self-reported at baseline (range 0-12 with higher scores reflecting greater severity). Primary outcomes were reporting being up to date with breast and cervical screening. For prospective analyses, patterns of screening participation from baseline to follow-up were identified. Logistic regression was used to analyse associations, adjusted for potential confounding factors.

resultsMore severe depressive symptoms were associated with reduced likelihood of breast (OR = 0.960, 95% CI: 0.950,0.970) and cervical (OR = 0.958, 95% CI: 0.950,0.966) screening participation, in cross-sectional analyses. Higher neuroticism scores were associated with reduced cervical screening participation, but the opposite was found for breast cancer screening. Examination of individual neuroticism items revealed that anxiety and worry were associated with increased breast screening. At follow-up, higher baseline depressive symptoms were related to decreased cervical screening (OR = 0.955, 95% CI: 0.913,0.999), but not with breast screening.

conclusionsMore severe depressive symptoms may be a barrier for breast and cervical screening and could be an indicator for more proactive strategies to improve uptake.

Indexed as

NeuroticismAdultAgedAnxietyBiological Specimen BanksBreast NeoplasmsCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMass ScreeningMiddle AgedProspective Studiesbreast cancercancercervical cancerdepressionepidemiologyneuroticismoncologypreventionscreening

Identifiers

PMID31663185
PMCPMC7002161
OpenAlexW2982336415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.