ArticleMedical physics2020
Tracer kinetic models as temporal constraints during brain tumor DCE-MRI reconstruction.
Article in Medical physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Model-constrained reconstruction accelerated with Fourier-based undersampling for hyperpolarized [1-Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Joint Optimization of k-t Sampling Pattern and Reconstruction of DCE MRI for Pharmacokinetic Parameter Estimation.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2022Article
- Maximum Entropy Technique and Regularization Functional for Determining the Pharmacokinetic Parameters in DCE-MRI.Journal of digital imaging · 2022Article
- Construction and imaging of a neurovascular unit model.Neural regeneration research · 2022Review
- Modified Maximum Entropy Method and Estimating the AIF via DCE-MRI Data Analysis.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Sparse precontrast TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2021Article
- Pseudo Test-Retest Evaluation of Millimeter-Resolution Whole-Brain Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MRI in Patients with High-Grade Glioma.Radiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo apply tracer kinetic models as temporal constraints during reconstruction of under-sampled brain tumor dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
methodsA library of concentration vs time profiles is simulated for a range of physiological kinetic parameters. The library is reduced to a dictionary of temporal bases, where each profile is approximated by a sparse linear combination of the bases. Image reconstruction is formulated as estimation of concentration profiles and sparse model coefficients with a fixed sparsity level. Simulations are performed to evaluate modeling error, and error statistics in kinetic parameter estimation in presence of noise. Retrospective under-sampling experiments are performed on a brain tumor DCE digital reference object (DRO), and 12 brain tumor in-vivo 3T datasets. The performances of the proposed under-sampled reconstruction scheme and an existing compressed sensing-based temporal finite-difference (tFD) under-sampled reconstruction were compared against the fully sampled inverse Fourier Transform-based reconstruction.
resultsSimulations demonstrate that sparsity levels of 2 and 3 model the library profiles from the Patlak and extended Tofts-Kety (ETK) models, respectively. Noise sensitivity analysis showed equivalent kinetic parameter estimation error statistics from noisy concentration profiles, and model approximated profiles. DRO-based experiments showed good fidelity in recovery of kinetic maps from 20-fold under-sampled data. In-vivo experiments demonstrated reduced bias and uncertainty in kinetic mapping with the proposed approach compared to tFD at under-sampled reduction factors >= 20.
conclusionsTracer kinetic models can be applied as temporal constraints during brain tumor DCE-MRI reconstruction. The proposed under-sampled scheme resulted in model parameter estimates less biased with respect to conventional fully sampled DCE MRI reconstructions and parameter estimation. The approach is flexible, can use nonlinear kinetic models, and does not require tuning of regularization parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.