Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31663068›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation2019

The ability of calcaneal and multisite quantitative ultrasound variables in the identification of osteoporosis in women and men.

Aydan Oral, Sina Esmaeilzadeh, Ayşe Yalıman, Dilşad Sindel, Pınar Kürsüz Köseoğlu, Tuğba Aydın

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Fragility fracture discriminative ability of radius quantitative ultrasound: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Bone Health for Gynaecologists.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aydan OralDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Sina EsmaeilzadehDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ayşe YalımanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Dilşad SindelDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Pınar Kürsüz KöseoğluDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Tuğba AydınDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Istanbul University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to assess the ability of calcaneal and multisite quantitative ultrasound (QUS) parameters in the identification of osteoporosis in women and men. PATIENTS AND

methodsA total of 131 women (mean age 53.7±11.9 years; range, 21 to 79 years) and 109 men (mean age 57.8±13.7 years; range, 24 to 85 years) whose bone mineral density (BMD) at the spine and proximal femur was measured between January 2010 and January 2012, using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were included. Acoustic bone properties were also examined using both a calcaneal and a multisite QUS. The receiver operating characteristic analysis with the calculation of areas under the curve (AUCs) to evaluate the ability of both QUS devices for the identification of osteoporosis. We also calculated a lower and an upper threshold at a specificity of 90% and at a sensitivity of 90%, respectively, for the identification of osteoporosis along with a threshold/cut-off value with the best compromise between sensitivity and specificity.

resultsAll calcaneal QUS parameters showed significant AUCs within the range of 0.712 (for Broadband Ultrasound Attenuation [BUA]) and 0.764 (for Speed of Sound [SOS]) in women and ranging from 0.661 (for BUA) to 0.735 (for SOS) in men, while only radial SOS of the multisite QUS demonstrated a significant AUC value of 0.661 for identifying osteoporosis in women. A Quantitative Ultrasound Index T-score of -1.53 for women and -1.68 for men showed sensitivity and specificities around 70%.

conclusionBased on the results of this study, all calcaneal QUS parameters in both women and men and possibly radial SOS measurements of the multisite QUS in women may be helpful for the identification of osteoporosis.

Indexed as

Calcaneal quantitative ultrasounddiagnostic abilitydual-energy X-ray absorptiometrymultisite quantitative ultrasoundosteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID31663068
PMCPMC6797920
OpenAlexW2975036087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.