Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31662966›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2019

Drugs and Clinical Approaches Targeting the Antiapoptotic Protein: A Review.

Zeping Han, Jiening Liang, Yuguang Li, Jinhua He

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. AhR and Cancer: From Gene Profiling to Targeted Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zeping HanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Central Hospital of Panyu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong 511400, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3804-7704
Jiening LiangSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Yuguang LiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Central Hospital of Panyu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong 511400, China.
Jinhua HeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Central Hospital of Panyu District, Guangzhou, Guangdong 511400, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4841-5179

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) is a regulator protein involved in apoptosis. In the past few decades, this protein has been demonstrated to have high efficacy in cancer therapy, and several approaches targeting Bcl-2 have been tested clinically (e.g., oblimersen, ABT-737, ABT-263, obatoclax mesylate, and AT-101). This review reports potential Bcl-2 inhibitors according to current information on their underlying mechanism and the results of clinical trials. In addition, the function and mechanisms of other potentially valuable Bcl-2 inhibitors that did not show efficacy in clinical studies are also discussed. This summary of the development of Bcl-2 inhibitors provides worthwhile viewpoints on the use of biomedical approaches in future cancer therapy.

Indexed as

Aniline CompoundsAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisBiphenyl CompoundsCell Line, TumorGossypolHumansLymphoma, B-CellNitrophenolsPiperazinesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2SulfonamidesThionucleotidesABT-737Aniline CompoundsAntineoplastic AgentsBiphenyl CompoundsGossypolgossypol acetic acidnavitoclaxNitrophenolsoblimersenPiperazinesProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2SulfonamidesThionucleotides

Identifiers

PMID31662966
PMCPMC6791192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.