Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31662868›Full record

ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2019

Evaluation and comparison of six noninvasive tests for prediction of significant or advanced fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Katharina Staufer, Emina Halilbasic, Walter Spindelboeck, Magdalena Eilenberg, Gerhard Prager, Vanessa Stadlbauer, Andreas Posch, Petra Munda, Rodrig Marculescu, Barbara Obermayer-Pietsch and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Katharina StauferDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-3687-9331
Emina HalilbasicDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Walter SpindelboeckDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Magdalena EilenbergDepartment of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gerhard PragerDepartment of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Vanessa StadlbauerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Andreas PoschDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Petra MundaDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Rodrig MarculescuDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Barbara Obermayer-PietschDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Judith StiftDepartment of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Carolin LacknerInstitute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Michael TraunerDepartment of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Rudolf E StauberDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATMedical University of Graz · ATUniversity Hospital of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), advanced fibrosis has been identified as an important prognostic factor with increased liver-related mortality and treatment need. Due to the high prevalence of NAFLD, noninvasive risk stratification is needed to select patients for liver biopsy and treatment. Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of several widely available noninvasive tests for assessment of fibrosis among patients with NAFLD with or without nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Methods: We enrolled consecutive patients with NAFLD admitted to two Austrian referral centers who underwent liver biopsy. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) was obtained by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE, FibroScan) and blood samples were collected for determination of enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) test, FibroMeter Results: Our study cohort contained 186 patients with histologically confirmed NAFLD. On liver histology, NASH was present in 92 patients (50%), significant fibrosis (F ≥ 2) in 71 patients (38%), advanced fibrosis (F ≥ 3) in 49 patients (26%), and F ≥ 3 plus NASH in 35 patients (19%). For diagnosis of F ≥ 2, F ≥ 3, and F ≥ 3 plus NASH, respectively, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed superior diagnostic accuracy of ELF score (area under ROC curve (AUROC) 0.85, 0.90, 0.90), FibroMeter Conclusion: Proprietary fibrosis panels and VCTE show superior diagnostic accuracy for noninvasive diagnosis of fibrosis stage in NAFLD as compared to FIB-4 and NFS.

Indexed as

AdultAustriaBiopsyDiagnosis, DifferentialElasticity Imaging TechniquesFemaleHumansLiver CirrhosisMaleMiddle AgedNon-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseasePredictive Value of TestsPrevalencePrognosisProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentEnhanced liver fibrosis scoreFibroMeterfibrosis-4 indexliver stiffness measurementNAFLD fibrosis scorevibration-controlled transient elastography

Identifiers

PMID31662868
PMCPMC6794685
OpenAlexW2957608484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.