Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31662749›Full record

ArticleJournal of oncology2019

Intraoperative Ultrasound Staging for Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Era of Liver-Specific Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Is It Still Worthwhile?

Serena Langella, Francesco Ardito, Nadia Russolillo, Elena Panettieri, Serena Perotti, Caterina Mele, Felice Giuliante, Alessandro Ferrero

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06779708 (ECHO-NET Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06779708 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

ECHO-NET Study: Role of Intraoperative Hepatic Ultrasonography in Patients with Gastrointestinal or Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor Without Liver Metastases At Preoperative Imaging

TypeobservationalSponsorIstituto Clinico HumanitasRan2020 to 2023Enrolled51ConditionsNeuroendocrine (NE) Tumors, Liver Metastasis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. History of liver surgery.Clinical liver disease
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Serena LangellaDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery, Ospedale Mauriziano "Umberto I", Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2300-0460
Francesco ArditoUnit of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1596-2862
Nadia RussolilloDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery, Ospedale Mauriziano "Umberto I", Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0627-186X
Elena PanettieriUnit of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Serena PerottiDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery, Ospedale Mauriziano "Umberto I", Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0139-6890
Caterina MeleUnit of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Felice GiulianteUnit of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2087-2589
Alessandro FerreroDepartment of General and Oncological Surgery, Ospedale Mauriziano "Umberto I", Torino, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1504-5810

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo assess the efficacy of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) compared with liver-specific magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs).

methodsFrom January 2010 to December 2017, 721 patients underwent MRI as a part of preoperative workup within 1 month before hepatectomy and were considered for the study. Early intrahepatic recurrence (relapse at cut surface excluded) was assessed 6 months after the resection and was considered as residual disease undetected by IOUS and/or MRI. IOUS and MRI performance was compared on a patient-by-patient basis. Long-term results were also studied.

resultsA total of 2845 CRLMs were detected by MRI, and the median number of CRLMs per patient was 2 (1-31). Preoperative chemotherapy was administered in 489 patients (67.8%). In 177 patients, 379 new nodules were intraoperatively found and resected. Among 379 newly identified nodules, 317 were histologically proven CRLMs (11.1% of entire series). The median size of new CRLMs was 6 ± 2.5 mm. Relationships between intrahepatic vessels and tumors differed between IOUS and MRI in 128 patients (17.7%). The preoperative surgical plan was intraoperatively changed for 171 patients (23.7%). Overall, early intrahepatic recurrence occurred in 8.7% of cases. To assess the diagnostic performance, 24 (3.3%) recurrences at the cut surface were excluded; thus, 5.4% of early relapses were considered for analysis. The sensitivity of IOUS was superior to MRI (94.5% vs 75.1%), while the specificity was similar (95.7% vs 95.9%). Multivariate analysis at the hepatic dome or subglissonian and mucinous histology revealed predictive factors of metastases missing at MRI. The 5-year OS (52.1% vs 37.8%,

conclusionsIOUS improves staging in patients undergoing resection for CRLMs even in the era of liver-specific MRI. Intraoperative detection of new CRLMs negatively affects oncologic outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID31662749
PMCPMC6778901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.