ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
Use of Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction for Detecting Minimal Residual Disease: A Prospective Multi-Institutional Study.
Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Current and Emerging Applications of Droplet Digital PCR in Oncology: An Updated Review.Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2022Review
- Digital PCR: A Reliable Tool for Analyzing and Monitoring Hematologic Malignancies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimDroplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) is an exact method of measuring nucleic acids. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate minimal residual disease (MRD) using ddPCR in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. PATIENTS AND
methodsBetween May 2013 and November 2014, CML patients treated with nilotinib were enrolled in our study. BCR/ABL1 transcripts levels were evaluated using ddPCR at the first time of complete molecular response (CMR). We enrolled 15 patients from 7 Institutions. The treatment period and median follow-up period were 45 months and 47 months, respectively.
resultsPatients with a high level of BCR/ABL1 transcript had a greater tendency to lose the CMR during the follow-up period (p=0.095). In addition, patients with a low level of BCR/ABL1 transcript showed a longer duration of CMR compared to those with a high level (p=0.032).
conclusionWe found that ddPCR is a sensitive method for detecting MRD and that MRD could affect the duration of the treatment response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.