ArticleRespiratory care2020
FEV
Article in Respiratory care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Spirometric Lung Function Among Smokers and Non-Smokers: A Cross-Sectional Study in University Students.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
- The Impact of Metabolic Syndrome Risk Factors on Lung Function Impairment: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2023Article
- Utility of biomarkers in the diagnosis and monitoring of asthmatic children.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2023Review
- All-cause and cardiovascular mortality in relation to lung function in the full range of distribution across four Eastern European cohorts.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Impaired lung function and mortality in Eastern Europe: results from multi-centre cohort study.Respiratory research · 2022Article
- How to Stage Airflow Limitation in Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Male Patients?American journal of men's healthArticle
- Population reference equations for handheld peak expiratory flow in older U.S. adults.Respiratory medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCommonly used thresholds for staging FEV
methodsIn 4,232 white persons ≥ 65 y old, sampled from the Cardiovascular Health Study, FEV
resultsFEV
conclusionsIn older persons, the proportion of deaths attributed to a reduced FEV
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.