Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31662396›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

HOspital care versus TELemonitoring in high-risk pregnancy (HOTEL): study protocol for a multicentre non-inferiority randomised controlled trial.

Josephus F M van den Heuvel, Wessel Ganzevoort, Jiska M De Haan-Jebbink, David P van der Ham, Koen L Deurloo, Laura Seeber, Arie Franx, Mireille N Bekker

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05778435 (The Effect Of The Wireless Fetal Monitoring Used During Birth On The Women's Comfort, Labour Pain And Birth Satisfaction), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05778435 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Effect Of The Wireless Fetal Monitoring Used During Birth On The Women's Comfort, Labour Pain And Birth Satisfaction

TypeinterventionalSponsorTokat Gaziosmanpasa UniversityRan2021 to 2021Enrolled88ConditionsPregnancy RelatedArmswireless fetal monitoring system
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Josephus F M van den HeuvelObstetrics and Gynaecology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1285-1019
Wessel GanzevoortObstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Universitair Medische Centra, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jiska M De Haan-JebbinkObstetrics and Gynaecology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
David P van der HamObstetrics and Gynaecology, Martini Ziekenhuis, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Koen L DeurlooObstetrics and Gynaecology, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Laura SeeberObstetrics and Gynaecology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Arie FranxObstetrics and Gynaecology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mireille N BekkerObstetrics and Gynaecology, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands m.n.bekker-3@umcutrecht.nl.
Utrecht University · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLDiakonessenhuis hospital · NLMartini Ziekenhuis · NLOLVG · NLSt. Antonius Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPregnant women faced with complications of pregnancy often require long-term hospital admission for maternal and/or fetal monitoring. Antenatal admissions cause a burden to patients as well as hospital resources and costs. A telemonitoring platform connected to wireless cardiotocography (CTG) and automated blood pressure (BP) devices can be used for telemonitoring in pregnancy. Home telemonitoring might improve autonomy and reduce admissions and thus costs. The aim of this study is to compare the effects on patient safety, satisfaction and cost-effectiveness of METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The HOTEL trial is an ongoing multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial with a non-inferiority design. Eligible pregnant women are >26+0 weeks of singleton gestation requiring monitoring because of pre-eclampsia (hypertension with proteinuria), fetal growth restriction, preterm rupture of membranes without contractions, recurrent reduced fetal movements or an intrauterine fetal death in a previous pregnancy.Randomisation takes place between traditional hospitalisation (planned n=208) versus telemonitoring (planned n=208) until delivery. Telemonitoring at home is facilitated with Sense4Baby CTG devices, Microlife BP monitor and daily telephone calls with an obstetric healthcare professional as well as weekly hospital visits.Primary outcome is a composite of adverse perinatal outcome, defined as perinatal mortality, 5 min Apgar <7 or arterial cord blood pH <7.05, maternal morbidity (eclampsia, HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelets) syndrome, thromboembolic event), neonatal intensive care admission and caesarean section rate. Patient satisfaction and preference of care will be assessed using validated questionnaires. We will perform an economic analysis. Outcomes will be analysed according to the intention to treat principle. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Utrecht University Medical Center and the boards of all six participating centres. Trial results will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR6076.

Indexed as

Blood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryCardiotocographyHospitalizationPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy, High-RiskPrenatal CareTelemedicineAdolescentAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth Care CostsHumansMulticenter Studies as TopiceHealthfetal growth restrictionfetal monitoringhigh-risk pregnancyhome-based carepreeclampsiapreterm birthtelemedicinetelemonitoring

Identifiers

PMID31662396
PMCPMC6830707
OpenAlexW2982365040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.