Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31662375›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Policy addressing suicidality in children and young people: an international scoping review.

Lynne Gilmour, Margaret Maxwell, Edward Duncan

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lynne GilmourNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK Lyg1@stir.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8876-5590
Margaret MaxwellNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Edward DuncanNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3400-905X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo map key policy documents worldwide and establish how they address the treatment and care needs of children and young people (CYP) who are suicidal.

designWe conducted a scoping review to systematically identify relevant key policy documents following a pre-established published protocol. DATA SOURCES: Four databases (CINAHL; Medline; PsycINFO; The Cochrane Database of Systematic reviews) and the websites of key government, statutory and non-statutory agencies were searched. Google and Google Scholar were used to identify other policy documents and relevant grey literature. Leading experts were consulted by email. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTED STUDIES: Policies, policy guidance, strategies, codes of conduct, national service frameworks, national practice guidance, white and green papers, and reviews of policy-concerned with indicated suicide prevention approaches for children up to 18 years old. Limited by English language and published after 2000. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data were extracted using a predetermined template. Second reviewers independently extracted 25%. Documents were categorised as international guidance, national policy and national guidance, and presented in a table providing a brief description of the policy, alongside how it specifically addresses suicidal CYP. Findings were further expressed using narrative synthesis.

results35 policy documents were included in the review. Although many recognise CYP as being a high-risk or priority population, most do not explicitly address suicidal CYP. In general, national guidance documents were found to convey that suicidal children should be assessed by a child and adolescent mental health practitioner but offer no clear recommendations beyond this.

conclusionThe lack of specific reference within policy documents to the treatment and care of needs of children who are suicidal highlights a potential gap in policy that could lead to the needs of suicidal children being overlooked, and varying interpretations of appropriate responses and service provision.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicSuicidal IdeationSuicide PreventionAdolescentAustraliaCanadaChildHealth PolicyHumansIrelandNew ZealandPublic PolicyUnited KingdomUnited NationsWorld Health OrganizationYoung Adultchildreninternationalpolicyscoping-reviewSuicideyoung people

Identifiers

PMID31662375
PMCPMC6830632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.