Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31662358›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

HPV self-sampling acceptability in rural and indigenous communities in Guatemala: a cross-sectional study.

Audrey R Murchland, Anna Gottschlich, Kristin Bevilacqua, Andres Pineda, Berner Andrée Sandoval-Ramírez, Christian S Alvarez, Gina S Ogilvie, Thomas E Carey, Mark Prince, Michael Dean and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Comparison of Human Papillomavirus Genotyping by Research vs. Clinical Assay for Two Self-Collection Devices.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Low Levels of Lifetime Pap Test Receipt Among Vulnerable Guatemalans.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Audrey R MurchlandEpidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Anna GottschlichEpidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Kristin BevilacquaEpidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Andres PinedaCenter for the Prevention of Chronic Diseases, Instituto de Nutricion de Centroamerica y Panama, Guatemala, Guatemala.
Berner Andrée Sandoval-RamírezFunctional Nutrition, Oxidation, and Cardiovascular Diseases Group (NFOC-Salut), Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan, Reus, Spain.
Christian S AlvarezEpidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Gina S OgilvieClinical Prevention Services, BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Thomas E CareyDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery and Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Mark PrinceDepartment of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Michael DeanLaboratory of Translational Genomics, Division of Cancer, Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Carlos Mendoza MontanoCenter for the Prevention of Chronic Diseases, Instituto de Nutricion de Centroamerica y Panama, Guatemala, Guatemala.
Alvaro Rivera-AndradeCenter for the Prevention of Chronic Diseases, Instituto de Nutricion de Centroamerica y Panama, Guatemala, Guatemala.
Rafael MezaEpidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA rmeza@umich.edu.

Funding

XenograftP30CA046592 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Alexey I Nesvizhskii · 1988 to 2026
$178.2M
Molecular Mechanisms of Tumor Behavior and Response to Therapy in HPV-positive Oropharyngeal CancerR01CA194536 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CAREY, THOMAS E. · 2016 to 2021
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA046592NCI NIH HHS R01 CA194536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCervical cancer disproportionately burdens low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) such as Guatemala. Self-collection testing for human papillomavirus (HPV) has been suggested as a form of cervical cancer screening to facilitate access in LMICs. This study assessed and compared the acceptability of self-collection HPV testing in two rural, indigenous and ethnically distinct communities in Guatemala: Santiago Atitlán, Sololá and Livingston, Izabal.

methodsAll participants, women between the ages of 18 and 60, completed a questionnaire. Eligible participants were also asked to self-collect a vaginal sample and complete a questionnaire regarding comfort and acceptability. Self-collected samples were tested for high-risk HPV using the real-time PCR Hybribio kit.

resultsIn the indigenous community of Santiago Atitlán, of 438 age-eligible participants, 94% completed self-collection. Of those, 81% found it comfortable and 98% were willing to use it as a form of screening. In the multiethnic (Afro-Caribbean, indigenous) community of Livingston, of 322 age-eligible participants, 53% chose to self-collect. Among those who took the test, 83% found it comfortable and 95% were willing to use it as a form of screening. In Livingston, literacy (can read and/or write vs cannot read or write) was higher in women who chose to self-collect (prevalence ratio 2.25; 95% CI 1.38 to 3.68). Ethnicity, history of screening and reproductive history were not associated with willingness to self-collect in Livingston. Women in Santiago reported less prior use of healthcare than women in Livingston. Overall, 19% (106/549) of samples tested positive for high-risk HPV.

conclusionAmong women willing to self-collect in rural and indigenous communities in Guatemala, self-collection for HPV testing is highly acceptable. However, willingness to try self-collection might vary across communities and settings. Women from a community that used less healthcare were more likely to choose self-collection. Further research is necessary to determine what factors influence a woman's choice to self-collect.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeIndigenous PeoplesPatient Acceptance of Health CareRural PopulationAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerEducational StatusEthnicityFemaleGuatemalaHumansLiteracyMarital StatusPapanicolaou TestPapillomavirus Infectionsepidemiologypublic health

Identifiers

PMID31662358
PMCPMC6830827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.