Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31662210›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine2019

The effect of executive function on adherence with a cardiac secondary prevention program and its interaction with an incentive-based intervention.

Diann E Gaalema, Sarahjane Dube, Alexandra Potter, Rebecca J Elliott, Katharine Mahoney, Stacey C Sigmon, Stephen T Higgins, Philip A Ades

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cognition and Exercise: GENERAL OVERVIEW AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CARDIAC REHABILITATION.Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Diann E GaalemaUniversity of Vermont, United States of America; Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Burlington, VT, United States of America. Electronic address: dgaalema@uvm.edu.
Sarahjane DubeUniversity of Vermont, United States of America; Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Burlington, VT, United States of America.
Alexandra PotterUniversity of Vermont, United States of America; Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Burlington, VT, United States of America.
Rebecca J ElliottUniversity of Vermont, United States of America.
Katharine MahoneyUniversity of Vermont, United States of America.
Stacey C SigmonUniversity of Vermont, United States of America; Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Burlington, VT, United States of America.
Stephen T HigginsUniversity of Vermont, United States of America; Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Burlington, VT, United States of America.
Philip A AdesUniversity of Vermont, United States of America; University of Vermont Medical Center, United States of America; Vermont Center on Behavior and Health, Burlington, VT, United States of America.

Funding

Vermont Center on Behavior and HealthP20GM103644 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI KHADANGA, SHERRIE · 2013 to 2022
$21.3M
Improving Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation among Lower-Socioeconomic Status Patients: Efficacy of Early Case Management and Financial IncentivesR33HL143305 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI ADES, PHILIP A., GAALEMA, DIANN E · 2019 to 2022
$3.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R33 HL143305NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103644
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Participation in secondary prevention programs such as cardiac rehabilitation (CR) reduces morbidity, mortality, and hospitalizations while improving quality of life. Executive function (EF) is a complex set of cognitive abilities that control and regulate behavior. EF predicts many health-related behaviors, but how EF interacts with interventions to improve treatment adherence is not well understood. The objective of this study is to examine if EF predicts CR treatment adherence and how EF interacts with an intervention to improve adherence. Data were collected from 2013 to 2018 in Vermont, USA. 130 Medicaid-enrolled individuals who had experienced a qualifying cardiac event were enrolled in a controlled clinical trial and randomized 1:1 to receive financial incentives for completing secondary prevention sessions or to usual care. In this secondary analysis, effects of EF on CR adherence (defined as completing ≥30/36 sessions) were examined in 112 participants (57 usual care, 55 intervention) who completed an EF battery. Delay-discounting, a measure of impulsivity, predicted CR adherence (p = 0.01) and interacted with the incentive intervention, such that those who exhibited greater discounting of future rewards benefitted more from the intervention than those who discounted less (F(1, 104) = 5.23, p = 0.02). Better cognitive flexibility, measured with the trail-making-task, also predicted CR adherence (p = 0.02). While EF has been associated with adherence to a variety of treatment regimens, this interaction between an incentive-based intervention to promote treatment adherence and EF is novel. This work illustrates the value of considering individual differences in EF when designing and implementing interventions to promote health-related behavior change.

Indexed as

MotivationAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCardiac RehabilitationFemaleHeart DiseasesHumansMaleMiddle AgedSecondary PreventionTreatment Adherence and ComplianceYoung AdultContingency managementExecutive functionIncentivesSocioeconomic statusTreatment adherence

Identifiers

PMID31662210
PMCPMC6939881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.