Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31662028›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2019

Predictive Score of Adverse Events After Carotid Endarterectomy: The NSQIP Registry Carotid Endarterectomy Scale.

Hormuzdiyar H Dasenbrock, Timothy R Smith, William B Gormley, Joseph P Castlen, Nirav J Patel, Kai U Frerichs, M Ali Aziz-Sultan, Rose Du

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Diabetes and carotid artery disease: a narrative review.Annals of translational medicine · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hormuzdiyar H DasenbrockDepartment of Neurosurgery Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston MA.
Timothy R SmithDepartment of Neurosurgery Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston MA.
William B GormleyDepartment of Neurosurgery Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston MA.
Joseph P CastlenDepartment of Neurosurgery Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston MA.
Nirav J PatelDepartment of Neurosurgery Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston MA.
Kai U FrerichsDepartment of Neurosurgery Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston MA.
M Ali Aziz-SultanDepartment of Neurosurgery Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston MA.
Rose DuDepartment of Neurosurgery Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston MA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The goal of this study was to create a comprehensive, integer-weighted predictive scale of adverse events after carotid endarterectomy (CEA), which may augment risk stratification and patient counseling. Methods and Results The targeted carotid files from the prospective NSQIP (National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) registry (2011-2013) comprised the derivation population. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated predictors of a 30-day adverse event (stroke, myocardial infarction, or death), the effect estimates of which were used to build a weighted predictive scale that was validated using the 2014 to 2015 NSQIP registry release. A total of 10 766 and 8002 patients were included in the derivation and the validation populations, in whom 4.0% and 3.7% developed an adverse event, respectively. The NSQIP registry CEA scale included 14 variables; the highest points were allocated for insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, high-risk cardiac physiological characteristics, admission source other than home, an emergent operation, American Society of Anesthesiologists' classification IV to V, modified Rankin Scale score ≥2, and presentation with a stroke. NSQIP registry CEA score was predictive of an adverse event (concordance=0.67), stroke or death (concordance=0.69), mortality (concordance=0.76), an extended hospitalization (concordance=0.73), and a nonroutine discharge (concordance=0.83) in the validation population, as well as among symptomatic and asymptomatic subgroups (

Indexed as

Risk AssessmentAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarotid StenosisDiabetes MellitusEmergenciesEndarterectomy, CarotidFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionPatient Readmissionadverse events complicationcarotid endarterectomycomplicationNational Surgical Quality Improvement Programstroke

Identifiers

PMID31662028
PMCPMC6898838

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.