Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31661859›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Detecting Mortality Trends in the Netherlands Across 625 Causes of Death.

Marianna Mitratza, Anton E Kunst, Jan W P F Kardaun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marianna MitratzaDepartment of Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.mitratza@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-1573-2015
Anton E KunstDepartment of Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.e.kunst@amsterdamumc.nl.
Jan W P F KardaunDepartment of Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. jwpf.kardaun@cbs.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cause of death (COD) data are essential to public health monitoring and policy. This study aims to determine the proportion of CODs, at ICD-10 three-position level, for which a long-term or short-term trend can be identified, and to examine how much the likelihood of identifying trends varies with COD size. We calculated annual age-standardized counts of deaths from Statistics Netherlands for the period 1996-2015 for 625 CODs. We applied linear regression models to estimate long-term trends, and outlier analysis to detect short-term changes. The association of the likelihood of a long-term trend with COD size was analyzed with multinomial logistic regression. No long-term trend could be demonstrated for 216 CODs (34.5%). For the remaining 409 causes, a trend could be detected, following a linear (211, 33.8%), quadratic (126, 20.2%) or cubic model (72, 11.5%). The probability of detecting a long-term trend increased from about 50% at six mean annual deaths, to 65% at 22 deaths and 75% at 60 deaths. An exceptionally high or low number of deaths in a single year was found for 16 CODs. When monitoring long-term mortality trends, one could consider a much broader range of causes of death, including ones with a relatively low number of annual deaths, than commonly used in condensed lists.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCause of DeathData CollectionFemaleHumansLinear ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMortalityNetherlandsPublic Health SurveillanceYoung Adultcauses of deathICD-10long-term trendsmonitoringmortalityshort-term fluctuationssize

Identifiers

PMID31661859
PMCPMC6862141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.