Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31661513›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Using family network data in child protection services.

Alex James, Jeanette McLeod, Shaun Hendy, Kip Marks, Delia Rusu, Syen Nik, Michael J Plank

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alex JamesSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Jeanette McLeodSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Shaun HendyTe Pūnaha Matatini, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3468-6517
Kip MarksMinistry of Social Development, Wellington, New Zealand.
Delia RusuMinistry of Social Development, Wellington, New Zealand.
Syen NikMinistry of Social Development, Wellington, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8094-5439
Michael J PlankSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-7539-3465

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preventing child abuse is a unifying goal. Making decisions that affect the lives of children is an unenviable task assigned to social services in countries around the world. The consequences of incorrectly labelling children as being at risk of abuse or missing signs that children are unsafe are well-documented. Evidence-based decision-making tools are increasingly common in social services provision but few, if any, have used social network data. We analyse a child protection services dataset that includes a network of approximately 5 million social relationships collected by social workers between 1996 and 2016 in New Zealand. We test the potential of information about family networks to improve accuracy of models used to predict the risk of child maltreatment. We simulate integration of the dataset with birth records to construct more complete family network information by including information that would be available earlier if these databases were integrated. Including family network data can improve the performance of models relative to using individual demographic data alone. The best models are those that contain the integrated birth records rather than just the recorded data. Having access to this information at the time a child's case is first notified to child protection services leads to a particularly marked improvement. Our results quantify the importance of a child's family network and show that a better understanding of risk can be achieved by linking other commonly available datasets with child protection records to provide the most up-to-date information possible.

Indexed as

AdolescentBirth CertificatesChildChild AbuseChild, PreschoolChild Protective ServicesChild WelfareFamilyFemaleHumansInfantMaleNew ZealandRecordsSocial SupportSocial Work

Identifiers

PMID31661513
PMCPMC6818793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.