Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31661510›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Transcriptional foliar profile of the C3-CAM bromeliad Guzmania monostachia.

Helenice Mercier, Maria Aurineide Rodrigues, Sónia Cristina da Silva Andrade, Luiz Lehmann Coutinho, Bruno Nobuya Katayama Gobara, Alejandra Matiz, Paulo Tamaso Mioto, Ana Zangirolame Gonçalves

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Helenice MercierDepartamento de Botânica, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7431-8837
Maria Aurineide RodriguesDepartamento de Botânica, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Sónia Cristina da Silva AndradeDepartamento de Genética e Biologia Evolutiva, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luiz Lehmann CoutinhoDepartamento de Zootecnia, Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Bruno Nobuya Katayama GobaraDepartamento de Botânica, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3615-9588
Alejandra MatizDepartamento de Botânica, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Paulo Tamaso MiotoDepartamento de Botânica, Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Ana Zangirolame GonçalvesDepartamento de Botânica, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9036-8831

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Guzmania monostachia is an epiphytic tank bromeliad that displays the inducible CAM photosynthesis under stressful conditions and had the highest stomata density in the leaf apex, while the base portion has the highest density of trichomes, which are specialized structures used to acquire water and nutrients from the tank solution. In order to correlate the genetic factors behind these morpho-physiological characteristics along the leaf blade of G. monostachia, a comparative transcriptome analysis was performed to identify the functional enriched pathways and unigenes that could play a role in the apical, middle and basal leaf portions. A total of 653 million reads were used for de novo transcriptome assembly, resulting in 48,051 annotated unigenes. Analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) among distinct leaf regions revealed that 806 DEGs were upregulated in the apex compared to the middle portion, while 9685 DEGs were upregulated in the apex and 9784 DEGs were upregulated in the middle portions compared to the base. Our outcomes correlated some DEGs and identified unigenes with their physiological functions, mainly suggesting that the leaf apex was related to the regulation of stomatal movement, production of chlorophyll, cellular response to stress, and H2O2 catabolic process. In contrast, the middle portion showed DEGs associated with the transport of amino acids. Furthermore, DEGs from the leaf base were mainly correlated with responses to nutrients and nitrogen compounds, regulation of potassium ion import, response to water deprivation, and trichome branching, indicating that, at least in part, this leaf portion can replace some of the root functions of terrestrial plants. Therefore, possibly candidate unigenes and enriched pathways presented here could be prospected in future experimental work, opening new possibilities to bioengineer non-inducible CAM plants and/or improve the fertilization use efficiency by increasing leaf nutrient acquisition of crop plants.

Indexed as

BromeliaBromeliaceaeChlorophyllDehydrationDroughtsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, PlantPhotosynthesisPlant LeavesTranscriptomeWaterChlorophyllWater

Identifiers

PMID31661510
PMCPMC6818958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.