Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31661470›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical investigation2020

Antigen-loaded monocyte administration induces potent therapeutic antitumor T cell responses.

Min-Nung Huang, Lowell T Nicholson, Kristen A Batich, Adam M Swartz, David Kopin, Sebastian Wellford, Vijay K Prabhakar, Karolina Woroniecka, Smita K Nair, Peter E Fecci and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. CCR2Cellular & molecular immunology · 2025
    Article
  3. Monocyte Involvement in the Pathogenesis of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  4. Biomaterial-Based Therapeutic Delivery of Immune Cells.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Min-Nung HuangDepartment of Immunology.
Lowell T NicholsonSchool of Medicine.
Kristen A BatichSchool of Medicine.
Adam M SwartzDepartment of Pathology.
David KopinSchool of Medicine.
Sebastian WellfordDepartment of Immunology.
Vijay K PrabhakarSchool of Medicine.
Karolina WoronieckaSchool of Medicine.
Smita K NairDepartment of Pathology.
Peter E FecciDepartment of Pathology.
John H SampsonDepartment of Pathology.
Michael D GunnDepartment of Immunology.
Texas Neurology · USIndiana University School of MedicineDuke Medical Center · US

Funding

Targeted Alpha-Particle Radiotheraphy of Brain Tumors with 211At-81C6 AntibodyP50CA190991 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SAMPSON, JOHN H. · 2014 to 2023
$20.8M
Medical Scientist Training Program Training GrantT32GM145449 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Christopher D Kontos · 2022 to 2026
$6.6M
Basic Immunology Training ProgramT32AI052077 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI KRANGEL, MICHAEL S · 2002 to 2024
$4.2M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA190991NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI052077NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM145449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficacy of dendritic cell (DC) cancer vaccines is classically thought to depend on their antigen-presenting cell (APC) activity. Studies show, however, that DC vaccine priming of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) requires the activity of endogenous DCs, suggesting that exogenous DCs stimulate antitumor immunity by transferring antigens (Ags) to endogenous DCs. Such Ag transfer functions are most commonly ascribed to monocytes, implying that undifferentiated monocytes would function equally well as a vaccine modality and need not be differentiated to DCs to be effective. Here, we used several murine cancer models to test the antitumor efficacy of undifferentiated monocytes loaded with protein or peptide Ag. Intravenously injected monocytes displayed antitumor activity superior to DC vaccines in several cancer models, including aggressive intracranial glioblastoma. Ag-loaded monocytes induced robust CTL responses via Ag transfer to splenic CD8+ DCs in a manner independent of monocyte APC activity. Ag transfer required cell-cell contact and the formation of connexin 43-containing gap junctions between monocytes and DCs. These findings demonstrate the existence of an efficient gap junction-mediated Ag transfer pathway between monocytes and CD8+ DCs and suggest that administration of tumor Ag-loaded undifferentiated monocytes may serve as a simple and efficacious immunotherapy for the treatment of human cancers.

Indexed as

Immunity, CellularImmunotherapyMonocytesNeoplasms, ExperimentalAnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesMiceMice, KnockoutAntigens, NeoplasmCancer immunotherapyDendritic cellsImmunologyMonocytesVaccines

Identifiers

PMID31661470
PMCPMC6994156
OpenAlexW2982687009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.