Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31661166›Full record

ArticleAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2019

High Opportunity Cost Demand as an Indicator of Weekday Drinking and Distinctly Severe Alcohol Problems: A Behavioral Economic Analysis.

Keanan J Joyner, Lidia Z Meshesha, Ashley A Dennhardt, Brian Borsari, Matthew P Martens, James G Murphy

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The effects of social context and opportunity cost on the behavioral economic value of cannabis.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Keanan J JoynerDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida.ORCID 0000-0002-5759-0879
Lidia Z MesheshaCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Ashley A DennhardtDepartment of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee.
Brian BorsariMental Health Service (116B), San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California.
Matthew P MartensDepartment of Educational, School, and Counseling Psychology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
James G MurphyDepartment of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee.
University of Memphis · USBrown University · USFlorida State University · USSan Francisco VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

ALCOHOL INTERVENTION/TREATMENT OUTCOME RESEARCH TRAININGT32AA007459 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI ROBERT MIRANDA, PETER M. MONTI · 1986 to 2026
$13.3M
Improving brief alcohol interventions with a behavioral economic supplementR01AA020829 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS · PI MURPHY, JAMES G. · 2012 to 2016
$2.6M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA020829NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBehavioral economic theory views addiction as a reinforcer pathology characterized by excessive demand for drugs relative to alternatives. Complementary to this theory, Lamb and Ginsburg (Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, 164, 2018, 62) describe addiction as a behavioral allocation disorder and predict that decisions to drink under increasingly stringent constraints are a central indicator of addiction. This study used a modified demand-curve paradigm to examine alcohol demand in the context of a next-day contingency (high opportunity cost demand) as a specific indicator of a severe pattern of alcohol problems.

methodsParticipants were 370 undergraduates (61.1% female, 86.5% white, M

resultsLow opportunity cost demand (β = 0.15, p = 0.02) significantly predicted beyond high opportunity cost demand for the least severe problems, and high opportunity cost demand (β = 0.17, p = 0.009) significantly predicted beyond low opportunity cost demand for the most severe problems. Similarly, low opportunity cost demand (β = 0.26, p < 0.001) was more highly associated with weekend drinking, whereas high opportunity cost demand (β = 0.21, p = 0.001) was more highly associated with weekday drinking.

conclusionsThe current results suggest high opportunity cost alcohol demand is a distinct marker of severe alcohol problems among college student heavy drinkers.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisAdolescentAlcohol Drinking in CollegeFemaleHumansMalePsychological TheoryYoung AdultAlcoholAlcohol DemandBehavioral Allocation DisorderBehavioral EconomicsYoung Adult Drinking

Identifiers

PMID31661166
PMCPMC6904428
OpenAlexW2982638746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.