Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31660988›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal for equity in health2019

Reported Māori consumer experiences of health systems and programs in qualitative research: a systematic review with meta-synthesis.

Suetonia C Palmer, Harriet Gray, Tania Huria, Cameron Lacey, Lutz Beckert, Suzanne G Pitama

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal for equity in health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Hybrid Leadership for Māori Health: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Social determinants of respiratory health from birth: still of concern in the 21st century?European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Suetonia C PalmerDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago Christchurch, 2 Riccarton Ave, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-7765-5871
Harriet GrayMāori and Indigenous Health Institute, University of Otago Christchurch, 45 Cambridge Terrace, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand.
Tania HuriaMāori and Indigenous Health Institute, University of Otago Christchurch, 45 Cambridge Terrace, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3533-8610
Cameron LaceyMāori and Indigenous Health Institute, University of Otago Christchurch, 45 Cambridge Terrace, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9898-6784
Lutz BeckertDepartment of Medicine, University of Otago Christchurch, 2 Riccarton Ave, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-2688-9325
Suzanne G PitamaMāori and Indigenous Health Institute, University of Otago Christchurch, 45 Cambridge Terrace, Christchurch, 8140, New Zealand. suzanne.pitama@otago.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0002-1664-0518

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersistent inequities in health experiences and outcomes are observed for Māori compared to non-Māori in Aotearoa New Zealand. We conceptualised factors associated with Māori consumer experiences of health programs and services and characterise how the recommendations arising from qualitative research inform strategies to address inequities.

methodsIn this systematic review, electronic literature searching was conducted in February 2018. Qualitative studies reporting Māori consumer experiences of health services and programs in Aotearoa New Zealand were eligible. Māori consumer experiences of health services were mapped to the WHO Commission of Social Determinants of Health (CSDH) conceptual framework on health inequities as related to: (i) the socioeconomic and political context; (ii) socioeconomic positioning; or (iii) intermediary factors that increase exposure to health-compromising conditions. Recommendations to improve consumer experiences were mapped to the CSDH framework for tackling social determinants of health inequities as policy directions on: (i) unequal consequences of illness (individual interaction); (ii) risks of exposure to health-damaging factors (community); (iii) exposures to health-damaging factors (public policies); and (iv) mitigating effects of socioeconomic and political stratification (environment).

resultsFifty-four studies were included. Māori consumer experiences mapped to social determinants of health inequities were most frequently related to direct interactions with health services and programs, particularly patient-clinician interactions (communication, relationships) and cultural competencies of clinicians and the system. Key recommendations by researchers mapped to potential strategies to address inequity were identified at all levels of the political, social and health system from individual interactions, community change, and broader public and system-level strategies. Recommendations were predominantly focused on actions to reduce risks of exposure to health-damaging factors including health literacy interventions, increased resources in cultural competencies and Māori capacity in health service development and workforce.

conclusionsMāori consumer experiences of health services and programs are an important informer of variables that impact health inequity. Strategies to tackle health inequities informed by Māori consumer experiences can be drawn from existing empirical research. Future qualitative exploration of how socioeconomic, political and public policies influence Māori consumer experiences of health services and programs could inform a broader range of structural policies to address health inequities.

Indexed as

Cultural CompetencyHealthcare DisparitiesHumansNew ZealandPopulation GroupsQualitative ResearchSocioeconomic FactorsHealth servicesIndigenousQualitySynthesisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31660988
PMCPMC6816189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.