Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31660925›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Parental support of the Canadian 24-hour movement guidelines for children and youth: prevalence and correlates.

Ryan E Rhodes, John C Spence, Tanya Berry, Guy Faulkner, Amy E Latimer-Cheung, Norman O'Reilly, Mark S Tremblay, Leigh Vanderloo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Ryan E RhodesBehavioural Medicine Laboratory, School of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education, University of Victoria, PO Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada. rhodes@uvic.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0940-9040
John C SpenceUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Tanya BerryUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Guy FaulknerUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Amy E Latimer-CheungQueen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Norman O'ReillyUniversity of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Mark S TremblayChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Leigh VanderlooParticipACTION, Toronto, ON, Canada.
University of Alberta · CAChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario · CAQueen's University · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Guelph · CAUniversity of Victoria · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo explore the prevalence of parental support for meeting the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Children and Youth, identify key interactive support profiles among the four movement behaviors, and investigate subsequent sociodemographic and social cognitive correlates of these profiles.

methodsA sample of Canadian parents (N = 1208) with children aged 5 to 17 years completed measures of the theory of planned behavior (TPB), and support of the four child movement behaviors via questionnaire. Differences in the proportion of parents supporting these four health behaviors were explored and demographic and social cognitive (attitude and perceived control) correlates of combinations of parental support for the four health behaviors were evaluated.

resultsChild and youth sleep behavior had the highest parental support (73%) and moderate to vigorous physical activity support had the lowest prevalence (23%). Interactive profiles of the four movement behaviors yielded six primary clusters and comprised wide variation from parents who supported none of these behaviors (19%), to parents who supported all four behaviors (14%). These profiles could be distinguished by the age of the child (younger children had higher support) and the gender of the parent (mothers provided more support), as well as constructs of the TPB, but TPB cognitions were more specific predictors of each health behavior rather than general predictors of aggregate health behavior clusters.

conclusionsTeenagers and fathers may represent key targets for parental support intervention of the 24-Hour Movement Guidelines. Intervention content may need to comprise the underlying foundations of attitude and perceived behavioral control to change parental support while considering the unique features of each health behavior to maximize related intervention effectiveness.

Indexed as

AttitudeExerciseGuidelines as TopicAdolescentCanadaChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleParentsPsychological TheorySurveys and QuestionnairesAttitudeIntentionParent-child relationshipParentingPerceived behavioral controlTheory of planned behavior

Identifiers

PMID31660925
PMCPMC6816147
OpenAlexW2981746870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.