ReviewBMC public health2019
What does it mean to conduct participatory research with Indigenous peoples? A lexical review.
Review in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Participatory approaches in the development of health interventions for migrants: a systematic review.BMJ open · 2021Pooled it
- Initial development of the Sugar-Sweetened Fruit Drink Questionnaire for examining beliefs, knowledge, and behaviors in an intervention to reduce sugar-sweetened fruit drink intake in Alaska Native children.Journal of public health dentistry · 2024Article
- Qualitative genomic research with Indigenous peoples: a scoping review of participatory practice.BMJ global health · 2024Article
- Article
- Experiences of students with disabilities in technical vocational education and training colleges.African journal of disability · 2024Article
- Coproducing health research with Indigenous peoples.Nature medicine · 2023Review
- Indigenous Elder-centered methodology: research that decolonizes and indigenizes.AlterNative (Auckland, N.Z. : 2005) · 2023Article
- Cues Disseminated by Professional Associations That Represent 5 Health Care Professions Across 5 Nations: Lexical Analysis of Tweets.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Knowledge translation in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander research contexts in Australia: scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Commentary: Developing Relationships through Trust in Indigenous Health Research.Healthcare policy = Politiques de sante · 2022Article
- 'You want to deal with power while riding on power': global perspectives on power in participatory health research and co-production approaches.BMJ global health · 2021Article
- Are we walking the talk of participatory Indigenous health research? A scoping review of the literature in Atlantic Canada.PloS one · 2021Article
- 'We walked side by side through the whole thing': A mixed-methods study of key elements of community-based participatory research partnerships between rural Aboriginal communities and researchers.The Australian journal of rural health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo better understand and promote public health, participatory research with Indigenous peoples represents recommended practice, worldwide. However, due to the different ways such research is referred to, described, and used, it is unclear what might (and might not) warrant the term when collaborating with Indigenous peoples. As such, this article expands conceptual understandings of participatory research with Indigenous peoples, across timelines and regions.
methodFollowing a systematic search of 29 academic databases in April 2018, a lexical analysis of the methods sections was conducted, which were sourced from 161 publications across 107 journals.
resultsThe active involvement of Indigenous peoples in research that is expressly participatory is limited across all project phases. This might be because the ways in which Indigenous peoples were involved throughout were not reported - however, it might also be because Indigenous peoples were not involved in all project phases. Furthermore, descriptions differ by study location and publication timeframe - notably, studies in the region of the Americas chiefly refer to pandemics, surveyors, and art; and those published in the last two decades have given primacy to artifacts of interest.
conclusionsFindings from this corpus of data suggest participatory research with Indigenous peoples is not always described across different project phases; furthermore, it differs according to study location and publication timeframe. This offers considerable opportunity to further this important research area via alternative methodologies that award primacy to Indigenous expertise and agency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.