Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31660893›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2019

Effect of interpregnancy weight change on perinatal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Noor E W D Teulings, Katya L Masconi, Susan E Ozanne, Catherine E Aiken, Angela M Wood

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Change in modifiable maternal characteristics and behaviours between consecutive pregnancies and offspring adiposity: A systematic review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Examining Interpregnancy Weight Change Across a Birthing Population in Aotearoa, New Zealand.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Relation between low birth weight or maternal obesity during pregnancy and cardiovascular risk factors.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Postpartum and interpregnancy care of women with a history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Noor E W D TeulingsDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, 2 Worth's Causeway Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK. nt358@medschl.cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8176-179X
Katya L MasconiDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, 2 Worth's Causeway Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK.
Susan E OzanneUniversity of Cambridge Metabolic Research Laboratories and MRC Metabolic Diseases Unit, Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Catherine E AikenUniversity of Cambridge Metabolic Research Laboratories and MRC Metabolic Diseases Unit, Wellcome Trust-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Angela M WoodDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, 2 Worth's Causeway Cambridge, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK.
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/16/53/32729British Heart Foundation RG/17/12/33167Isaac Newton Trust Joint grant University of CambridgeMedical Research Council G0700463Medical Research Council MC_UU_00014/4Medical Research Council MC_UU_12012/4Medical Research Council MR/L003120/1National Institute for Health Research NIHR BTRU-2014-10024Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust Joint grant University of Cambridge
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough obesity is a well-known risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes, evidence is sparse about the effects of interpregnancy weight change on the risk of adverse perinatal complications in a subsequent pregnancy. The current study aims to assess the effect of interpregnancy weight change on the risk of developing gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia, pregnancy induced hypertension, preterm birth, or delivering a large- or small-for-gestational age neonate.

methodsPubmed, Ovid Embase, ClinicalTrial.gov and the Cochrane library were systematically searched up until July 24th, 2019. Interpregnancy weight change was defined as the difference between pre-pregnancy weight of an index pregnancy and a consecutive pregnancy. Inclusion criteria included full text original articles reporting quantitative data about interpregnancy weight change in multiparous women with any time interval between consecutive births and the risk of any perinatal complication of interest. Studies reporting adjusted odds ratios and a reference group of - 1 to + 1 BMI unit change between pregnancies were harmonised by meta-analysis.

resultsTwenty-three cohort studies identified a total of 671,906 women with two or more consecutive pregnancies. Seven of these studies were included in the meta-analysis (280,672 women). Interpregnancy weight gain was consistently associated with a higher risk of gestational diabetes, pre-eclampsia, pregnancy induced hypertension and large-for-gestational age births. In contrast, interpregnancy weight loss was associated with a lower risk of delivering a large-for-gestational age neonate. The effect magnitude (relative risk) of interpregnancy weight gain on pregnancy induced hypertension or delivering a large-for-gestational age neonate was greater among women with a normal BMI in the index pregnancy compared to women with a starting BMI ≥25 kg/m

conclusionThese findings confirm that interpregnancy weight change impacts the risk of developing perinatal complications in a subsequent pregnancy. This provides evidence in support of guidelines encouraging women to achieve post-partum weight loss, as their risk of perinatal complications might be minimised if they return to their pre-pregnancy weight before conceiving again. Prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42017067326).

Indexed as

Body-Weight TrajectoryBirth IntervalsFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomeRisk FactorsBMIHypertensive disorders of pregnancyInterpregnancy weight changeMeta-analysisObesityPerinatal complicationsSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31660893
PMCPMC6819632
OpenAlexW2981612344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.