Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31660882›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2019

Salivary creatinine as a diagnostic tool for evaluating patients with chronic kidney disease.

Dada Oluwaseyi Temilola, Karla Bezuidenhout, Rajiv Timothy Erasmus, Lawrence Stephen, Mogamat Razeen Davids, Haly Holmes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Human Serum and Salivary Metabolomes: Diversity and Closeness.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dada Oluwaseyi TemilolaDivision of Oral Medicine and Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.
Karla BezuidenhoutDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Rajiv Timothy ErasmusDivision of Chemical Pathology, National Health Laboratory Service, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Lawrence StephenDivision of Oral Medicine and Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.
Mogamat Razeen DavidsDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Haly HolmesDivision of Oral Medicine and Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa. hholmes@uwc.ac.za.ORCID 0000-0001-8297-8536

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreliminary studies have shown the potential use of salivary creatinine concentration in the diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD). For saliva to replace serum as a diagnostic tool, studies must be done to determine its effectiveness in the diagnosis and staging of CKD. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the use of salivary creatinine as a safe and non-invasive alternative for identifying patients with CKD.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted at Tygerberg Hospital in Cape Town, on 230 patients, across all stages of CKD. Ethical approval to conduct the study was obtained from the University of the Western Cape Biomedical Research Ethics Committee, and written informed consent was provided by each participant. Saliva and serum samples were collected for creatinine analysis and the correlation determined using Spearman's correlation. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to determine the diagnostic ability of salivary creatinine. A cut-off value for optimal sensitivity and specificity of salivary creatinine to diagnose CKD with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m

resultsSerum creatinine values ranged from 46 μmol/L to 1581 μmol/L, with a median value of 134 μmol/L. Salivary creatinine values ranged from 3 μmol/L to 400 μmol/L, with a median of 11 μmol/L. There was a strong positive correlation (r = 0.82) between serum and salivary creatinine values. Linear regression analysis of serum and salivary creatinine for CKD patients was significant in all CKD stages, except for stage 1. Area under the curve for salivary creatinine was 0.839. A cut-off value of 8.5 μmol/L yielded a sensitivity of 78.3% and specificity of 74.0% for classifying patients as having CKD based on estimated GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m

conclusionsThe results support the potential of salivary creatinine as a non-invasive diagnostic tool for estimating GFR and identifying patients with CKD.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveCreatinineCross-Sectional StudiesFalse Negative ReactionsFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRenal Insufficiency, ChronicCreatinineChronic kidney diseaseSalivary creatinineSerum creatinine

Identifiers

PMID31660882
PMCPMC6819387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.