ArticleBMC rheumatology2019
A systematic review of guidelines for managing rheumatoid arthritis.
Article in BMC rheumatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Diagnostic accuracy of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- What are the core recommendations for rheumatoid arthritis care? Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines.Clinical rheumatology · 2023Pooled it
- Systematic review of recommendations on the use of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis.Clinical rheumatology · 2021Pooled it
- Cervus and cucumis peptides combined umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells therapy for rheumatoid arthritis.Medicine · 2020Trial
- Multi-Targeted Therapeutic Mechanisms of Huangqi Guizhi Wuwu Decoction Against Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Integrated Approach Combining Serum Pharmacochemistry, Network Pharmacology, Metabolomics, and Experimental Validation.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a clinical scoring system for the prediction of methotrexate treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a multicenter real-world study.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2026Article
- Patterns of steroid use in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis commencing treatment with biologic or targeted synthetic DMARDs.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2026Article
- Management and treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis, process and barriers among rheumatologists in Spain: a Delphi consensus.BMC rheumatology · 2025Article
- Chinese guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: 2024 update.Rheumatology and immunology research · 2024Article
- Article
- Significant functional impairment and disability in individuals with psoriatic arthritis and Achilles tendon pain: a cross-sectional observational study.Rheumatology international · 2024Observational
- Patterns in the Sequential Treatment of Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Starting a Biologic or Targeted Synthetic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug: 10-Year Experience From a US-Based Registry.ACR open rheumatology · 2024Article
- Sinulariolide Suppresses Inflammation of Fibroblast-Like Synoviocytes in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Mitigates Collagen-Induced Arthritis Symptoms in Mice.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
- Serum matrix metalloproteinase-3 levels monitor the therapeutic efficacy in Syrian patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Pharmacological strategies for mitigating anti-TNF biologic immunogenicity in rheumatoid arthritis patients.Current opinion in pharmacology · 2023Review
- International evidence-based guidelines on hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review.Journal of public health research · 2023Review
- Remission or Not Remission, That's the Question: Shedding Light on Remission and the Impact of Objective and Subjective Measures Reflecting Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Rheumatology and therapy · 2022Article
- How long does it take to translate research findings into routine healthcare practice?-the case of biological drugs for rheumatoid arthritis in Brazil.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Lebanese Hospital-Based Rheumatoid Arthritis Registry: Characteristics of Patients and Comparison with Other Populations.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe systematically reviewed current guidelines for managing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to evaluate their range and nature, assess variations in their recommendations and highlight divergence in their perspectives.
methodsWe searched Medline and Embase databases using the terms 'clinical practice guidelines' and 'rheumatoid arthritis' from January 2000 to January 2017 together with publications of national and international bodies. We included guidelines providing recommendations on general RA management spanning a range of treatments and published in English. We undertook narrative assessments due to the heterogeneity of the guidelines.
resultsWe identified 529 articles; 22 met our inclusion criteria. They were primarily developed by rheumatologists with variable involvement of patient and other experts. Three dealt with early RA, one established RA and 18 all patients. Most guidelines recommend regular assessments based on the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology core dataset; 18 recommended the disease activity score for 28 joints. Twenty recommended targeting remission; 16 suggested low disease activity as alternative. All guidelines recommend treating active RA; 13 made recommendations for moderate disease. The 21 guidelines considering early RA all recommended starting disease modifying drugs (DMARDs) as soon as possible; methotrexate was recommended for most patients. Nineteen recommended combination DMARDs when patients failed to respond fully to monotherapy and biologics were not necessarily indicated. Twenty made recommendations about biologics invariably suggesting their use after failing conventional DMARDs, particularly methotrexate. Most did not make specific recommendations about using one class of biologics preferentially. Eight recommended tapering biologics when patients achieved sustained good responses.
conclusionsFive general principles transcend most guidelines: DMARDs should be started as soon as possible after the diagnosis; methotrexate is the best initial treatment; disease activity should be regularly monitored; give biologics to patients with persistently active disease who have already received methotrexate; remission or low disease activity are the preferred treatment target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.