Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31660521›Full record

ArticleFuture healthcare journal2019

There is no 'I' in team but there may be a PA.

Jeannie Watkins, Kate Straughton, Natalie King

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Future healthcare journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Doctors', Patients' and Physician Associates' Perceptions of the Physician Associate Role in the Emergency Department.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  2. Corrigendum: Updated declaration of interest.Future healthcare journal · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Learning to speak up and to learn differently.Future healthcare journal · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jeannie WatkinsSt George's, University of London, London, UK.
Kate StraughtonUniversity of Worcester, Worcester, UK.
Natalie KingSurrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust, Redhill, UK.
St George's, University of London · GBSurrey and Sussex Healthcare NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Worcester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physician associates (PAs) are a relatively new medical professional group working as part of the multidisciplinary team to deliver patient care. This article aims to look at how PAs can work effectively in teams, highlighting the benefits and current working practices of PAs across the NHS and address the concerns and challenges raised.

Indexed as

medical teamsmultidisciplinary teamsPhysician associates

Identifiers

PMID31660521
PMCPMC6798019
OpenAlexW2979652827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.