Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31660323›Full record

ReviewEye and vision (London, England)2019

Hydrus microstent implantation for surgical management of glaucoma: a review of design, efficacy and safety.

Saba Samet, Jeb A Ong, Iqbal Ike K Ahmed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eye and vision (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. HydrusJournal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Mid-term real world outcomes of the HydrusEye (London, England) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Position of the ISTENT InjectJournal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The PreserFlo MicroShunt in the Context of Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Saba Samet1Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2097-9952
Jeb A Ong1Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada.
Iqbal Ike K Ahmed1Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the advent of microinvasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS), the spectrum of modalities available to manage patients with this chronic and heterogeneous condition has broadened. Despite its novelty however, there has been a rapid evolution in the development of a multitude of devices, each targeting a structure along the aqueous drainage pathway. A growing body of evidence has demonstrated IOP and medication burden reduction, and a more favorable safety profile with MIGS procedures in contrast to traditional incisional surgeries. Among the array of MIGS, the Hydrus® Microstent (Ivantis, Inc., Irvine, CA) is a recent FDA approved device, designed to bypass the trabecular meshwork and provide a scaffold for Schlemm's canal. The objective of this article is to review the Hydrus from conception to clinical use, and present data on its efficacy and safety to date. The available literature has shown promise, however inherent to all novel devices, only long-term monitoring will ensure sustained IOP control and an acceptable safety profile. Surgical advancements in glaucoma have revolutionized the field, and continued research and development will establish these approaches in clinical treatment algorithms.

Indexed as

Drainage deviceGlaucomaHydrusMinimally invasive glaucoma surgerySchlemm’s canal

Identifiers

PMID31660323
PMCPMC6805473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.