ArticleMethodsX2019
Optimal focus evaluated using Monte Carlo simulation in non-invasive neuroimaging in the second near-infrared window.
Article in MethodsX, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Monte Carlo Modeling of Shortwave-Infrared Fluorescence Photon Migration in Voxelized Media for the Detection of Breast Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adjusting the focal plane through the intact scalp of mice is crucial in novel angiography of cerebral vasculature using quantum dots emitting second near-infrared light at a wavelength of 1100 nm. Reagents were administered through the caudal vein. When we focused 0.4 mm below the scalp surface, based on the anatomical properties of mice reported previously, the intensity of clear fluorescence images observed transiently under a microscope became very weak within several seconds. The remaining time was extremely short to repeat adjustment of the focal plane. To investigate focus, photons exciting quantum dots at depths of 0.4, 0.8, 1.4, and 2.0 mm and emission photons were tracked in a four-layered Monte Carlo model including the scalp, skull, cerebrospinal fluid, and cortex. Based on the most near-ballistic photons emitted from quantum dots at 0.4 mm depth and specification of the microscope used, including numerical aperture and depth of field, the optimal focus plane was set. •Novel angiography for cerebrovascular structures was proposed using quantum dots with second near-infrared fluorescence.•Anatomical properties reported previously allowed focusing 0.4 mm below the surface of intact scalp before observation under fluorescence.•Clear images of cerebrovascular structures were attributed to many near-ballistic photons emitted from quantum dots at 0.4 mm depth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.