Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31660264›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

An eight-mRNA signature predicts the prognosis of patients with bladder urothelial carcinoma.

Rui Zhu, Xin Yang, Wenna Guo, Xin-Jian Xu, Liucun Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Construction and Validation of a 7-Immune Gene Model for Prognostic Assessment of Esophageal Carcinoma.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rui ZhuDepartment of Mathematics, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Xin YangSchool of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Wenna GuoSchool of Life Sciences, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Xin-Jian XuDepartment of Mathematics, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Liucun ZhuSchool of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai University · CNZhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBladder cancer is one of the most common cancers, and its histopathological type is mainly bladder urothelial carcinoma, accounting for about 90%. The prognostic biomarkers of bladder cancer are classified into clinical features biomarkers and molecular biomarkers. Nevertheless, due to the existence of individual specificity, patients with similar pathological characteristics still have great differences in the risk of disease recurrence. Therefore, it is often inaccurate to predict the survival status of patients based on clinical characteristic biomarkers, and a prognostic molecular biomarker that can grade the risk of bladder cancer patients is needed.

methodsA total of three bladder urothelial carcinoma datasets were used in this study from the Cancer Genome Atlas database and Gene Expression Omnibus database. In order to avoid overfitting, all samples were randomly divided into one training set and three validation sets, which were used to construct and test the prognostic biomarker model of bladder urothelial carcinoma. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression were used to screen candidate mRNAs and construct prognostic biomarkers model. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to evaluate the predictive performance of the model.

resultsA prognostic biomarker model of bladder urothelial carcinoma combining with eight mRNA was constructed. Kaplan-Meier analyses indicated that a significant difference in the survival time of patients between the high-risk and the low-risk group. The area under the ROC curve were 0.632 (95% confidence interval (CI) [0.541-0.723]), 0.693 (95% CI [0.601-0.784]) and 0.686 (95% CI [0.540-0.831]) when the model was used to predict the patient's survival time in three validation datasets. The model showed high accuracy and applicability.

Indexed as

BiomarkerBladder urothelial carcinomaPrognosisRisk-stratification

Identifiers

PMID31660264
PMCPMC6814068
OpenAlexW2982017640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.