Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31660259›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

Consuming alternative prey does not influence the DNA detectability half-life of pest prey in spider gut contents.

Dávid Fülöp, Éva Szita, Regina Gerstenbrand, Gergely Tholt, Ferenc Samu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dávid FülöpDepartment of Zoology, Plant Protection Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, Budapest, Hungary.
Éva SzitaDepartment of Zoology, Plant Protection Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, Budapest, Hungary.
Regina GerstenbrandDepartment of Zoology, Plant Protection Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, Budapest, Hungary.
Gergely TholtDepartment of Zoology, Plant Protection Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, Budapest, Hungary.
Ferenc SamuDepartment of Zoology, Plant Protection Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, Budapest, Hungary.
Centre for Agricultural Research · HUPlant Protection Institute · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKey natural enemy-pest interactions can be mapped in agricultural food webs by analysing predator gut content for the presence of a focal pest species. For this, PCR-based approaches are the most widely used methods providing the incidence of consumption of a focal pest in field sampled predators. To interpret such data the rate of prey DNA decay in the predators' gut, described by DNA detectability half-life (

methodsIn a laboratory feeding experiment, we determined

resultsWe created a PCR protocol that detects

Indexed as

Cereal pestDigestion timeDNA detectability half-lifeLeafhopperPCRSpider natural enemy

Identifiers

PMID31660259
PMCPMC6814063
OpenAlexW2981660526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.