ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2019
Community advisory boards: Experiences and common practices of clinical and translational science award programs.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcomes of shared institutional review board compared with multiple individual site institutional review board models in a multisite clinical trial.American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM · 2023Trial
- Sisters impacting the SISTER diabetes study: partnering with a Patient Advisory Group across the research continuum.Research involvement and engagement · 2026Article
- Continuous Glucose Monitoring Intervention for Hispanic Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Receiving Care in a Federally Qualified Health Center: Protocol for a Mixed Methods, Pragmatic Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Community engagement and implementation science: a hermeneutic review for implementation scientists.Implementation science communications · 2026Review
- A case study of enhancing bidirectional feedback between research programs and an institutional community engagement advisory board.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026Article
- "No research about us, without us:" a qualitative study to engage with community research advisory boards in the urban community.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Operationalising Inclusion for Participatory Design: Worked Examples for TRIPOD+AI & PROBAST+AI.Health services insights · 2026Article
- Article
- Building and sustaining restorative community trust and engagement: the Co-Researcher Activation Network.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- Community advisory boards to inform behavioural health research in primary care: protocol for a scoping review.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Building Community Resilience Through Trauma-Informed Solutions: Lessons Learned from a Social Accelerator in Rural North Carolina.Community mental health journal · 2025Article
- Composing authorship teams for health equity: an introduction to the health equity research production model.International journal for equity in health · 2025Article
- Article
- CENTER-ing Black voices: incorporating lived experience across the research process to advance equity in drug treatment and outcomes.Harm reduction journal · 2025Article
- Community-Engaged Approach to Improve Food Access and Consumption of Fruits and Vegetables in a Rural Appalachian Community.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Characteristics of research review boards in the context of community-academic settings: A scoping review.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Review
- Sexual risk and HIV prevention choices among men who are mobile for work: Results from a rapid ethnographic assessment for the Mobile Men trial in South Africa and Uganda.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Community engagement contributions to rural health research: Researchers' experience with the Midwest Rural Health Research Community Advisory Board.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Transcreation and Feasibility of Spanish-Language Pediatric Post-Transplant Adherence App (BMT4me©): Insights from a Community Advisory Board Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Developing the engage for equity institutional multi-sector survey: Assessing academic institutional culture and climate for community-based participatory research (CBPR).Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Community advisory boards (CABs) are a valuable strategy for engaging and partnering with communities in research. Eighty-nine percent of Clinical and Translational Science Awardees (CTSA) responding to a 2011 survey reported having a CAB. CTSAs' experiences with CABs are valuable for informing future practice. This study was conducted to describe common CAB implementation practices among CTSAs; document perceived benefits, challenges, and contributions; and examine their progress toward desirable outcomes. A cross-CTSA collaborative team collected survey data from respondents representing academic and/or community members affiliated with CTSAs with CABs. Data representing 44 CTSAs with CABs were analyzed using descriptive statistics. A majority of respondents reported practices reflecting respect for CAB members' expertise and input such as compensation (75%), advisory purview beyond their CTSA's Community Engagement program (88%), and influence over CAB operations. Three-quarters provide members with orientation and training on roles and responsibilities and 89% reported evaluating their CAB. Almost all respondents indicated their CTSA incorporates the feedback of their CABs to some degree; over half do so a lot or completely. This study profiles practices that inform CTSAs implementing a CAB and provide an evaluative benchmark for those with existing CABs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.