ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2018
An exploratory study of Clinical and Translational Science Award community-engaged research training programs.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engaging stakeholders to strengthen support for community-engaged research at Stanford School of Medicine: An institutional assessment and action planning approach.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- The Stacked Community Engagement model: A practical model for developing community-engaged academic medical faculty.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Community engagement education in academic health centers, colleges, and universities.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2022Article
- Collaboration and Context in the Design of Community-Engaged Research Training.Health promotion practice · 2021Article
- Implementation and Evaluation of a Dual-Track Research Training Program for Community Members and Community-Based Organizations.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) institutions are increasing development of training programs in community-engaged research (CEnR) to support translational science.
methodsThis study sampled posters at CTSA national meetings to identify CEnR training approaches, topics, and outcomes.
resultsQualitative analysis of 30 posters revealed training topics and outcomes focused primarily on CEnR capacity building, overcoming barriers, systems change, and sustainability.
conclusionFurther research should focus on development and results of CTSA CEnR training program metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.