Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31660206›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental epigenetics2019

Epigenetics in the public sphere: interdisciplinary perspectives.

Michel Dubois, Séverine Louvel, Anne Le Goff, Catherine Guaspare, Patrick Allard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental epigenetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A content analysis of health-related epigenetic information in YouTube videos.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. DNA methylation-environment interactions in the human genome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michel DuboisEpigenetics, Data, Politics (EpiDaPo), CNRS, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Séverine LouvelUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Sciences Po Grenoble, PACTE, Grenoble, France.
Anne Le GoffInstitute for Society and Genetics (ISG), University of Califonia Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Catherine GuaspareEpigenetics, Data, Politics (EpiDaPo), CNRS, The George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Patrick AllardInstitute for Society and Genetics (ISG), University of Califonia Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the high public interest in epigenetics, few scholars have empirically investigated the forms, reasons and consequences of the public circulation of epigenetics. Using an original database focusing on 'lifestyle' or 'everyday' epigenetics, this article aims to promote an open-minded and interdisciplinary dialogue between the public appropriation of epigenetics and the current scientific state of the art. It raises three main questions: Are there any specific modes of circulation of epigenetics in the general public? Why does epigenetics seem so appealing to the public? Within the public repertoire of epigenetics, is it possible to identify some specific knowledge claims and, if so, given the current state of the art, what is their degree of accuracy? The article argues that the social diffusion of epigenetics frequently carries on beliefs and misconceptions about genetics and epigenetics. The social life of epigenetics fuels a collective 'illusion' of control and empowerment on the basis of which new markets expand. More unexpectedly, this article underlines the emergence of a new scientific culture, i.e. the 'scientifization' of the cultural appropriation of epigenetics. Our analysis can inform the scientific community about the current and evolving state of the public representation of epigenetics and help it frame outreach activities.

Indexed as

beliefconsumerismempowermentepigeneticsinterdisciplinarityknowledge claimlifestylepublic perceptionscientific culturescientific popularization

Identifiers

PMID31660206
PMCPMC6812041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.