Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31660178›Full record

ArticleNursing open2019

Associations of dry skin, skin care habits, well-being, sleep quality and itch in nursing home residents: Results of a multicentre, observational, cross-sectional study.

Elisabeth Hahnel, Ulrike Blume-Peytavi, Jan Kottner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. [Modern management of chronic wounds].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Elisabeth HahnelDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Hair and Skin Science Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1121-0540
Ulrike Blume-PeytaviDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Hair and Skin Science Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany.
Jan KottnerDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Hair and Skin Science Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany.
Clinical Research Center for Hair and Skin Science · DEGhent University · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimDry skin is one of the most frequent cutaneous problems in aged long-term care residents. Although it is clinically relevant, the impact on quality of life is unclear. The objective was to measure well-being, sleep quality and itch in nursing home residents being 65 years and older and to explore possible associations with demographics, dry skin and skincare habits.

designMulticentre, observational, cross-sectional.

methodsSleep quality was assessed with the Richards-Campbell Sleep Quality Questionnaire, well-being with the WHO-Five Well-being Index and itch with the 5-D Itch scale. Skin dryness was measured using the Overall Dry Skin score.

resultsA total of 51 residents were included. The item scores of the sleep quality and itch questionnaires were strongly associated with each other. Demographics, dry skin and skincare habits were not associated with the questionnaires. It is unclear whether basic skincare activities can improve the quality of life in this population.

Indexed as

nursing homepatient‐reported outcome measuresskin caresleep qualitywell‐being

Identifiers

PMID31660178
PMCPMC6805713
OpenAlexW2963140475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.