Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31660170›Full record

ArticleNursing open2019

A systematic review of diabetes self-management education interventions for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Asian Western Pacific (AWP) region.

Arbaktun Mohamed, Emily Staite, Khalida Ismail, Kirsty Winkley

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Education programmes for people with chronic kidney disease and diabetes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arbaktun MohamedDepartment of Psychological Medicine Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London UK.
Emily StaiteDepartment of Psychological Medicine Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0414-9892
Khalida IsmailDepartment of Psychological Medicine Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience King's College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6084-449X
Kirsty WinkleyFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing Midwifery & Palliative Care King's College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1725-6040
King's College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

objectivesTo assess the effectiveness of educational and/or psychological diabetes self-management education (DSME) intervention for people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in the Asian Western Pacific (AWP) region.

backgroundTranslational research indicates that DSME is effective; therefore, it is important to look at the AWP region to see what has been implemented and what the potential barriers are for the low integration of DSME. The need for DSME is present, and programmes are being developed. Therefore, focusing a systematic review of DSME research in the AWP region would give a better understanding of which intervention approaches are associated with better clinical outcomes and are culturally acceptable.

designA systematic review.

methodsA review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative studies to evaluate the effectiveness of face-to-face delivery reporting educational and/or psychological interventions for people with T2DM was implemented. We conducted searches using MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed and ASSIA databases between January 1990-June 2018. Studies published in English and non-English were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data on participant and intervention characteristics. The quality of evidence was rated on predetermined criteria. Main outcomes included glycaemic control (reduction in HbA1c level).

resultsWe included 21 DSME programmes (17 RCTs), while 15 were group-based approaches. Twelve studies (60%) were categorized as high quality. Three studies (25%) had a moderate (good) effect. Eight trials were effective in improving glycaemic control and reported statistically significant improvements in HbA1c levels. 50% of these were high-intensity group-based programmes.

Indexed as

Asian Western Pacific regiondiabetes self‐management educationinterventionssystematic reviewtype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID31660170
PMCPMC6805261
OpenAlexW2971366036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.