ArticleNursing open2019
Validity evaluation of the genetics and genomics in nursing practice survey.
Article in Nursing open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nurses' Genomic Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceived Organizational Support: A Comparative Secondary Analysis of Genetics and Genomics in Nursing Practice Survey Data.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2026Article
- Assessing Genomic Competencies: Insights From the Genetics and Genomics Nursing Practice Survey (GGNPS).Nursing research and practice · 2026Article
- Oncology nurses' readiness to implement genomics-informed care: A descriptive, cross-sectional study in a Canadian province.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026Article
- Article
- Evaluation of the Integration of Genetics and Genomics Into Nursing Practice.Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing · 2026Article
- The Genomic Essential Competencies Expected for all Registered Nurses.The Nursing clinics of North America · 2025Review
- Global Health and Genomics.The Nursing clinics of North America · 2025Review
- Genomic Literacy among Nurses in Jordan: A Population-based Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023Article
- The Canadian Landscape of Genetics and Genomics in Nursing: A Policy Document Analysis.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- A Scoping Review: Do instruments measuring genomic competence in nursing incorporate ethics?Nursing open · 2023Article
- Test/Retest Reliability of a Turkish Version of the Genetics and Genomics in Nursing Practice Survey.Journal of nursing measurement · 2022Article
- Nurses' Knowledge, Attitudes, Confidence, and Practices with Genetics and Genomics: A Theory-Informed Integrative Review Protocol.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Genetics and Genomics Teaching in Nursing Programs in a Latin American Country.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Genetics and genomic competency of Turkish nurses: A descriptive cross-sectional study.Nurse education today · 2022Article
- Validity evaluation of the genetics and genomics in nursing practice survey.Nursing open · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo psychometrically test the Genetics and Genomics Nursing Practice Survey (GGNPS) for evidence of content, face and construct validity.
designThis study was a secondary data analysis.
methodData collected from the Method for Introducing a New Competency into Nursing Practice (MINC) study were used to evaluate the GGNPS for evidence of construct validity via structural equation modelling and confirmatory factor analysis. Face validity was evaluated via feedback from practicing RNs without specific experience with or knowledge of genetics/genomics. Content validity was evaluated via content expert feedback and assessment of a content validity index.
resultsThe thresholds for evidence of content and face validity were met. However, we found less evidence for construct validity of the GGNPS; an exploratory factor analysis, conducted to gain additional insight into the theorized latent constructs, determined that the variables were more interrelated that previously predicted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.