Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31660165›Full record

ArticleNursing open2019

Nurses' attitudes towards diabetes in tertiary care: A cross-sectional study.

Ali Hassan Alhaiti, Mohammed Senitan, Selvanaayagam Shanmuganathan, Cliff Dacosta, Linda Katherine Jones, George Binh Lenon

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ali Hassan AlhaitiSchool of Health and Biomedical Sciences RMIT University Melbourne Victoria Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9300-0293
Mohammed SenitanDepartment of Public Health, College of Health Sciences Saudi Electronic University Riyadh Saudi Arabia.
Selvanaayagam ShanmuganathanMenzies Centre for Health Policy, Sydney School of Public Health University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia.
Cliff DacostaSchool of Health and Biomedical Sciences RMIT University Melbourne Victoria Australia.
Linda Katherine JonesSchool of Health and Biomedical Sciences RMIT University Melbourne Victoria Australia.
George Binh LenonSchool of Health and Biomedical Sciences RMIT University Melbourne Victoria Australia.

Funding

Research BaseP30DK092926 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MARY ELLEN MICHELE HEISLER, ADESUWA B OLOMU · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the attitude and training of nurses in Saudi Arabia towards the care of patients with diabetes.

designA cross-sectional study.

methodsData were collected in 2016 from 1,695 participants at the King Fahad Medical City using the Diabetes Attitude Scale version 3.

resultsMost nurses had not received diabetes training. The agreement score of nurses for the requirement of special training for the management of diabetes is high; the survey found that most nurses were aware of the psychological effect of diabetes. However, the low agreement regarding the perception of the seriousness of diabetes among nurses and the valuing of self-care attributes such as tight control of glycaemic level in patients with diabetes indicates the need for diabetes training.

Indexed as

attitudediabetesdiabetes attitude scalehealthcare providersnursesnursing practicetertiary caretype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID31660165
PMCPMC6805279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.