Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31660161›Full record

ArticleNursing open2019

Predicting the functional independence during the recovery phase for poststroke patients.

Sadeq Al-Fayyadh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sadeq Al-FayyadhAdult Nursing Department, School of Nursing University of Baghdad Baghdad Iraq.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1194-1143
University of Baghdad · IQ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuccessful recovery of stroke survivors can be challenging. However, when targeted functional capacities are predicted early in the recovery phase, necessary nursing intervention can be initiated aiming at supporting the client moving forward in the rehabilitation journey.

aimsThis study aimed to evaluate stroke self-efficacy of poststroke patients and identify the differences in stroke self-efficacy level among some relevant variables.

designA descriptive cross-sectional design was employed to achieve the aforementioned objectives.

methodsA purposive sample of 207 poststroke patients who were recovering from stroke in three major teaching hospitals at Baghdad city were recruited to participate in the study. Data collection process started 3 November 2016 -15 May 2017. Inclusion criteria embraced stroke patients who were adult, have Glasgow Coma Scale score 14-15, capable of giving written or verbal consent. The modified version of the stroke self-efficacy questionnaire was used for data collection.

resultsA significant statistical difference at the

Indexed as

functional capacityindependencenursingrehabilitationstrokestroke‐related‐self‐efficacy

Identifiers

PMID31660161
PMCPMC6805273
OpenAlexW2960595384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.