Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31660149›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2019

The evidence-base for the management of flexor tendon injuries of the hand: Review.

Athanasius Ishak, Akshaya Rajangam, Ankur Khajuria

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Exploring the Palmar Surface: A Critical Case Report for Emergency Physicians.Clinical practice and cases in emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Athanasius IshakFaculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Science (CHAPS), King's College London, Strand, London, WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom.
Akshaya RajangamFaculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Centre for Human and Applied Physiological Science (CHAPS), King's College London, Strand, London, WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom.
Ankur KhajuriaDepartment of Plastic Surgery, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK.
King's College London · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

•There is no consensus on the optimal flexor tendon repair technique at each anatomical flexor zone.•There is paucity of high quality evidence.•Heterogenous study designs limit inter-study comparisons.•Patient reported outcome measures are crucial but there is a perennial need for robust disease-specific tools to be utilised.

Indexed as

Hand surgeryPatient reported outcome measuresPrimary flexor tendon repairRehabilitationWide awake surgery

Identifiers

PMID31660149
PMCPMC6806617
OpenAlexW2981068750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.