Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31660049›Full record

ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology

Skin barrier function in patients under radiation therapy due to the head and neck cancers - Preliminary study.

Jakub Pazdrowski, Adriana Polaſska, Joanna Kaźmierska, Wojciech Barczak, Mateusz Szewczyk, Zygmunt Adamski, Ryszard Żaba, Paweſ Golusiſski, Wojciech Golusiſski, Aleksandra Daſczak-Pazdrowska

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Radiation-induced skin injury in the head and neck region: pathogenesis, clinics, prevention, treatment considerations and proposal for management algorithm.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jakub PazdrowskiDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Garbary 15, 61-866 Poland.
Adriana PolaſskaDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Przybyszewskiego 49, Poznan, 60-355, Poland.
Joanna KaźmierskaRadiotherapy Department II Greater Poland Cancer Center, Garbary 15, Poznan, 61-866 Poland.
Wojciech BarczakDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Garbary 15, 61-866 Poland.
Mateusz SzewczykDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Garbary 15, 61-866 Poland.
Zygmunt AdamskiDepartment of Dermatology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Przybyszewskiego 49, Poznan, 60- 355 Poland.
Ryszard ŻabaDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Przybyszewskiego 49, Poznan, 60-355, Poland.
Paweſ GolusiſskiDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Garbary 15, 61-866 Poland.
Wojciech GolusiſskiDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Garbary 15, 61-866 Poland.
Aleksandra Daſczak-PazdrowskaDepartment of Dermatology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Przybyszewskiego 49, Poznan, 60- 355 Poland.
Poznan University of Medical Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo present the possibility of non-invasive monitoring of the skin after radiotherapy in regards of epidermal barrier function.

backgroundRadiodermatitis constitutes 95% of all side effects in patients after radiotherapy. The proper assessment of the severity of radiodermatitis can be determined using semi-quantitative clinical scores [Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 4.0 (CTCAE)].The most accepted way to analyze the epidermal barrier function is to determine Transepidermal Water Loss (TEWL). MATERIAL AND

methodsIn prospective study, we included 16 patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy or concomitant chemoradiation in whom we performed non-invasive assessments of the skin barrier function, including TEWL measurement. The final analysis included 6 patients (4 treated with adjuvant radiotherapy, 2 with radical chemoradiation). Clinical assessment of irradiated skin was based on target lesion score (TLS) and CTCAE v 4.0.

resultsThe mean TLS score in the middle of irradiation was 1.6 points, after last irradiation it was 2.3 points; 3 months later the mean TLS score was: 0. CTCAE v 4.0 criteria: 2 patients had grade 0, 3 patients - grade 1; 1 patient - grade 2. There were statistically significant differences in TEWL related to irradiated skin in the following time intervals: before vs. in the middle; before vs. day after; in the middle vs. day after; in the middle vs. 3 months after; day after vs. 3 months after.

conclusionsThe study showed that radiotherapy causes skin barrier dysfunction in all patients independently of clinical radiodermatitis. The biophysical features of this dysfunction can precede clinical symptoms and they can be assessed by non-invasive and objective methods.

Indexed as

Head neckHigh frequency ultrasonographyRadiodermatitisRadiotherapySquamous cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID31660049
PMCPMC6807069
OpenAlexW2980474875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.