Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31659922›Full record

ArticleJournal of cognitive neuroscience2020

Perception of Rhythmic Speech Is Modulated by Focal Bilateral Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation.

Benedikt Zoefel, Isobella Allard, Megha Anil, Matthew H Davis

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05446350 (Modulating Speech Perception With Current Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05446350 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Modulating Speech Perception With Current Stimulation (SPEECHSTIM)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, ToulouseRan2022 to 2025Enrolled126ConditionsHealthyArmstranscranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), electroencephalography (EEG), brain imaging (fMRI), electroencephalography (EEG) with neurofeedback
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cutaneous Alternating Current Stimulation Can Cause a Phasic Modulation of Speech Perception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. The Inattentional Rhythm in Audition.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Differential Auditory and Visual Phase-Locking Are Observed during Audio-Visual Benefit and Silent Lip-Reading for Speech Perception.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Benedikt ZoefelUniversity of Cambridge.
Isobella AllardUniversity of Cambridge.
Megha AnilUniversity of Cambridge.
Matthew H DavisUniversity of Cambridge.
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U105580446Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/5Medical Research Council SUAG/008/RG91365
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several recent studies have used transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) to demonstrate a causal role of neural oscillatory activity in speech processing. In particular, it has been shown that the ability to understand speech in a multi-speaker scenario or background noise depends on the timing of speech presentation relative to simultaneously applied tACS. However, it is possible that tACS did not change actual speech perception but rather auditory stream segregation. In this study, we tested whether the phase relation between tACS and the rhythm of degraded words, presented in silence, modulates word report accuracy. We found strong evidence for a tACS-induced modulation of speech perception, but only if the stimulation was applied bilaterally using ring electrodes (not for unilateral left hemisphere stimulation with square electrodes). These results were only obtained when data were analyzed using a statistical approach that was identified as optimal in a previous simulation study. The effect was driven by a phasic disruption of word report scores. Our results suggest a causal role of neural entrainment for speech perception and emphasize the importance of optimizing stimulation protocols and statistical approaches for brain stimulation research.

Indexed as

Transcranial Direct Current StimulationAdultCerebral CortexFemaleHumansMalePlacebosPsychomotor PerformanceSpeech PerceptionTime FactorsYoung AdultPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID31659922
PMCPMC7212037
OpenAlexW2982451166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.