Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31659803›Full record

Trial reportClinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology2020

A phase 2 study to evaluate the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of DP2 antagonist GB001 and to explore biomarkers of airway inflammation in mild-to-moderate asthma.

Hector Ortega, Mary Fitzgerald, Kartik Raghupathi, Cindy-Ann Tompkins, Jinshan Shen, Karen Dittrich, Caroline Pattwell, Dave Singh

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Molecular basis for lipid recognition by the prostaglandin DProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Hector OrtegaGossamer Bio Inc, San Diego, CA, USA.
Mary FitzgeraldPieris Pharmaceuticals, Boston, MA, USA.
Kartik RaghupathiGossamer Bio Inc, San Diego, CA, USA.
Cindy-Ann TompkinsGossamer Bio Inc, San Diego, CA, USA.
Jinshan ShenGossamer Bio Inc, San Diego, CA, USA.
Karen DittrichGossamer Bio Inc, San Diego, CA, USA.
Caroline PattwellMedicines Evaluation Unit, Manchester University Hospital Trust, Manchester, UK.
Dave SinghMedicines Evaluation Unit, Manchester University Hospital Trust, Manchester, UK.
Gossamer Bio (United States) · USUniversity of Manchester · GBPieris Pharmaceuticals (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGB001 is an oral antagonist of the prostaglandin D2 receptor that may inhibit recruitment and activation of airway eosinophils, reducing airway inflammation.

objectiveTo assess GB001 safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics from a Phase 2 study and explore the association between type 2 biomarkers (fractional exhaled nitric oxide and blood eosinophils) and asthma control markers following GB001 administration.

methodsA randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study evaluating 36 patients with mild-to-moderate atopic asthma. Patients receiving fluticasone propionate ≤500 mcg/day or equivalent were randomized (2:1) to GB001 (30 mg) or placebo once daily for 28 days. Safety, pharmacokinetics, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, asthma control questionnaire and rescue medication use were assessed. Clinical outcomes were analysed post hoc by baseline fractional exhaled nitric oxide (<35 and ≥35 ppb) and blood eosinophil (<250 and ≥250 cells/µL) subgroups.

resultsGB001 was well tolerated and rapidly absorbed with a 14.5-hour terminal half-life. Overall, GB001 demonstrated greater improvement relative to placebo in forced expiratory volume in 1 second at Day 28 (102 mL [95% CI: -110, 314]). Greater effects on forced expiratory volume in 1 second were observed in the high baseline fractional exhaled nitric oxide and blood eosinophil subgroups (207 mL [95% CI: -283, 698];133 mL [95% CI: -422, 687], respectively). These effects were observed as early as Day 2 (229 mL [95% CI: -170, 628]; 163 mL [95% CI: -223, 550] for the high baseline fractional exhaled nitric oxide and blood eosinophil subgroups, respectively) and were sustained through treatment completion. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: GB001 was well tolerated, with the estimated half-life supporting once-daily (QD) dosing. GB001 may have a rapid and sustained effect on lung function, particularly in patients with type 2 phenotype. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

Anti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaAdolescentAdultBiomarkersBreath TestsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReceptors, ImmunologicReceptors, ProstaglandinAnti-Asthmatic AgentsBiomarkersprostaglandin D2 receptorReceptors, ImmunologicReceptors, Prostaglandinatopic asthmaCRTH2DP2 antagonisteosinophilic asthmaprostaglandin D2

Identifiers

PMID31659803
PMCPMC7027764
OpenAlexW2982379564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.