Article in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Shaofeng SuiDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health Monitoring and Assessment, Shandong Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jinan, 250014, People's Republic of China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8476-2410
Jack NgQueensland Alliance for Environmental Health Sciences (QAEHS), The University of Queensland, 39 Kessels Road, Coopers Plains, QLD, 4108, Australia.
Yanxin GaoDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health Monitoring and Assessment, Shandong Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jinan, 250014, People's Republic of China.
Cheng PengQueensland Alliance for Environmental Health Sciences (QAEHS), The University of Queensland, 39 Kessels Road, Coopers Plains, QLD, 4108, Australia.
Chang HeQueensland Alliance for Environmental Health Sciences (QAEHS), The University of Queensland, 39 Kessels Road, Coopers Plains, QLD, 4108, Australia.
Guoling WangDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health Monitoring and Assessment, Shandong Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Jinan, 250014, People's Republic of China.
Zhiyan LiuDepartment of Pathology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 44# Wenhua West Road, Lixia Area, Jinan, 250012, People's Republic of China. zhiyanliu@sdu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9668-7756
Shandong Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNThe University of Queensland · AUShandong University · CN
Funding
Medical Science and technology development program of Shandong Province 2017WS295National Nature Science Foundation of China 81972500Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province ZR2019MH024
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
PM
Indexed as
Air PollutionCarcinogensChinaCoalDustEnvironmental MonitoringFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansMetalloidsMetalsParticulate MatterRisk AssessmentSeasonsSoilCarcinogensCoalDustMetalloidsMetalsParticulate MatterSoilAmbient PM2.5Enrichment factorFactor analysisHealth risk assessmentMetal and metalloid elements
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Pollution characteristics and chronic health risk assessment of metals and metalloids in ambient PM · full record | OpenQuestion