Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31659676›Full record

ArticleLa Radiologia medica2020

CT angiography for pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: investigation of a protocol by 20 ml of high-concentration contrast medium.

Mario Silva, Gianluca Milanese, Rocco Cobelli, Carmelinda Manna, Edoardo Rasciti, Sara Poggesi, Nicola Sverzellati

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in La Radiologia medica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mario SilvaSection of Radiology, Unit of Surgical Sciences, Department of Medicine and Surgery (DiMeC), University of Parma, Pad. Barbieri, via Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy. mario.silva@unipr.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2538-7032
Gianluca MilaneseSection of Radiology, Unit of Surgical Sciences, Department of Medicine and Surgery (DiMeC), University of Parma, Pad. Barbieri, via Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy.
Rocco CobelliSection of Radiology, Diagnostic Department, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Carmelinda MannaSection of Radiology, Diagnostic Department, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
Edoardo RascitiSection of Radiology, Unit of Surgical Sciences, Department of Medicine and Surgery (DiMeC), University of Parma, Pad. Barbieri, via Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy.
Sara PoggesiSection of Radiology, Unit of Surgical Sciences, Department of Medicine and Surgery (DiMeC), University of Parma, Pad. Barbieri, via Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy.
Nicola SverzellatiSection of Radiology, Unit of Surgical Sciences, Department of Medicine and Surgery (DiMeC), University of Parma, Pad. Barbieri, via Gramsci 14, 43126, Parma, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo retrospectively compare semi-qualitative and quantitative CT pulmonary angiography (CTPAs) image metrics testing diagnostic performance between protocols performed by 20 or 40 ml of contrast medium (CM) in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE).

methodsA total of 102 CTPAs performed by 20 ml (ultra-low volume: ULV) and 74 CTPAs performed by 40 ml (low volume: LV) protocol for the diagnosis of clinically suspected PE performed between October 2012 and September 2013 were retrieved. High-concentration CM (Iomeprol 400 mgI/ml) was injected at 3 ml/s (iodine delivery rate 1.2 mgI/s). Two radiologists (blinded and independent) semi-qualitatively scored vascular enhancement and image noise according to a five-point visual scoring system. Quantitative analysis was performed by regions of interest quantifying densitometric parameters, such as central and peripheral pulmonary arteries vascular contrast enhancement (CE, threshold for diagnostic CE ≥ 250 HU), and metrics for image noise. Continuous variables were compared by the Student's t test between groups if normally distributed while categorical variables were analyzed with the Chi-squared test. Interobserver agreement was calculated by the weighted kappa test; correlation coefficients were calculated using Pearson's correlation tests.

resultsThe semi-qualitative scores for central and peripheral pulmonary arteries vascular CE were sufficient by ULV, yet inferior than LV (p < 0.001). Semi-qualitative image noise was comparable between ULV and LV, and the interobserver agreement was only fair for quality of peripheral vessels. Agreement on nondiagnostic semi-qualitative parameters was seen in 9/102 (8.8%) ULV CTPAs, in particular associated with massive PE (2/9), pleuro-pulmonary abnormalities (5/9) or without major abnormalities (2/9). Quantitative analysis showed that mean CE was lower in ULV group (p < 0.001), though greater than the diagnostic threshold of 250 HU in both groups.

conclusionsDiagnostic vascular CE (> 250 HU) was obtained in both 20 ml and 40 ml CTPAs. CTPA by 20 ml of CM rendered diagnostic CE for the assessment of pulmonary arteries in patients with clinical suspicion of acute PE. Decreased image quality was mostly associated with massive PE or concomitant pleuro-parenchymal abnormalities.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsEmergency Service, HospitalAgedComputed Tomography AngiographyContrast MediaFemaleHumansIopamidolMalePulmonary EmbolismRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaiomeprolIopamidolComputed tomography pulmonary angiographyContrast mediumPulmonary embolism

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.