Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31659605›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2020

Development of a Concussion Risk Function for a Youth Population Using Head Linear and Rotational Acceleration.

Eamon T Campolettano, Ryan A Gellner, Eric P Smith, Srinidhi Bellamkonda, Casey T Tierney, Joseph J Crisco, Derek A Jones, Mireille E Kelley, Jillian E Urban, Joel D Stitzel and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Eamon T CampolettanoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA. eamonc@vt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0540-1028
Ryan A GellnerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Eric P SmithDepartment of Statistics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Srinidhi BellamkondaDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
Casey T TierneyDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
Joseph J CriscoDepartment of Orthopaedics, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
Derek A JonesVirginia Tech-Wake Forest School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Mireille E KelleyVirginia Tech-Wake Forest School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Jillian E UrbanVirginia Tech-Wake Forest School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Joel D StitzelVirginia Tech-Wake Forest School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Amaris GenemarasSimbex, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Jonathan G BeckwithSimbex, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Richard M GreenwaldSimbex, Lebanon, NH, USA.
Arthur C MaerlenderCenter for Brain, Biology, and Behavior, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA.
Per Gunnar BrolinsonEdward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Stefan M DumaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Steven RowsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Virginia Tech · USVirginia Tech - Wake Forest University School of Biomedical Engineering & Sciences · USBrown University · USSimbex (United States) · USEdward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine · USUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · US

Funding

Biomechanical Basis of Pediatric mTBI Due to Sports Related ConcussionR01NS094410 · NINDS · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI DUMA, STEFAN, GREENWALD, RICHARD M · 2015 to 2019
$3.3M
iTAKL: Imaging Telemetry And Kinematic modeLing in youth footballR01NS082453 · NINDS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GIOIA, GERARD A., MALDJIAN, JOSEPH A · 2014 to 2018
$3.3M
National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment 1-SAC-2017NINDS NIH HHS 1R01NS082453NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS082453NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS094410NINDS NIH HHS R01NS094410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physical differences between youth and adults, which include incomplete myelination, limited neck muscle development, and a higher head-body ratio in the youth population, likely contribute towards the increased susceptibility of youth to concussion. Previous research efforts have considered the biomechanics of concussion for adult populations, but these known age-related differences highlight the necessity of quantifying the risk of concussion for a youth population. This study adapted the previously developed Generalized Acceleration Model for Brian Injury Threshold (GAMBIT) that combines linear and rotational head acceleration to model the risk of concussion for a youth population with the Generalized Acceleration Model for Concussion in Youth (GAM-CY). Survival analysis was used in conjunction with head impact data collected during participation in youth football to model risk between individuals who sustained medically-diagnosed concussions (n = 15). Receiver operator characteristic curves were generated for peak linear acceleration, peak rotational acceleration, and GAM-CY, all of which were observed to be better injury predictors than random guessing. GAM-CY was associated with an area under the curve of 0.89 (95% confidence interval: 0.82-0.95) when all head impacts experienced by the concussed players were considered. Concussion tolerance was observed to be lower for youth athletes, with average peak linear head acceleration of 62.4 ± 29.7 g compared to 102.5 ± 32.7 g for adults and average peak rotational head acceleration of 2609 ± 1591 rad/s

Indexed as

AccelerationModels, TheoreticalRotationAccelerometryAdolescentBrain ConcussionChildFootballHeadHumansRiskBiomechanicsFootballHelmetMild traumatic brain injuryRisk curve

Identifiers

PMID31659605
PMCPMC6928097
OpenAlexW2982387630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.