Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31659487›Full record

ArticleEJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry2019

Comparison of desferrioxamine and NODAGA for the gallium-68 labeling of exendin-4.

Simon A M Kaeppeli, Roger Schibli, Thomas L Mindt, Martin Behe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Development of an automated radiosynthesis for [EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2026
    Article
  3. Site-SpecificBioconjugate chemistry · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Cold Kit Labeling: The Future ofFrontiers in medicine · 2022
    Review
  8. HER3 PET Imaging:Cancers · 2021
    Article
  9. [International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  10. Radiolabelling of the octadentate chelators DFO* and oxoDFO* with zirconium-89 and gallium-68.Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Simon A M KaeppeliCenter for Radiopharmaceutical Sciences ETH-PSI-USZ, Paul Scherrer Institute, OIPA/102, Forschungsstrasse 111, 5232, Villigen-PSI, Switzerland.
Roger SchibliCenter for Radiopharmaceutical Sciences ETH-PSI-USZ, Paul Scherrer Institute, OIPA/102, Forschungsstrasse 111, 5232, Villigen-PSI, Switzerland.
Thomas L MindtLudwig Boltzmann Institute Applied Diagnostics, General Hospital Vienna (AKH), c/o Sekretariat Nuklearmedizin Währinger Gürtel 18-20, Vienna, Austria.
Martin BeheCenter for Radiopharmaceutical Sciences ETH-PSI-USZ, Paul Scherrer Institute, OIPA/102, Forschungsstrasse 111, 5232, Villigen-PSI, Switzerland. martin.behe@psi.ch.
Paul Scherrer Institute · CHETH Zurich · CHMedical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

Seventh Framework Programme 602812
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRadiolabeled exendin-4 (Ex4) derivatives are used to target the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) for the clinical diagnosis of insulinomas, a rare type of neuroendocrine tumor. Gallium-68 is an ideal diagnostic nuclide for this application and a study evaluating an exendin-4-NODAGA conjugate is currently underway. However, in complexion with the chelator DFO, its in vivo stability has been a matter of dispute. The aim of this work was to directly compare [

methodsIn our approach, we directly compared N'-[5-(acetyl-hydroxy-amino)pentyl]-N-[5-[3-(5-aminopentyl-hydroxy-carbamoyl)propanoylamino]pentyl]-N-hydroxy-butane diamide (desferriox-amine B, DFO) and 2-(4,7-bis (carboxymethyl)-1,4,7-triazonan-1-yl) pentanedioic acid (NODAGA) conjugated to exendin-4 in vitro and in vivo. We radiolabeled the peptides with gallium-68, followed by HPLC quality control. In vitro characterization was performed in CHL cells overexpressing the GLP-1R and in vivo studies were conducted with CD1 nu/nu mice carrying tumors derived from these cells.

resultsWe found that both peptides could be radiolabeled with a molar activity of about 9.33 MBq/nmol without further purification. They internalized equally well into GLP-1R-expressing cells and their IC CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: DFO is a suitable chelator for the radiolabeling of exendin-4 derivatives with gallium-68 for in vitro and preclinical in vivo studies. DFO performed better in vivo due to its significantly lower kidney accumulation (p < 0.0001). It was also found to be stable in vivo in mice, contrary to earlier reports. Based on our results, the DFO chelating system in combination with exendin-4 would be an interesting option for clinical imaging of insulinomas.

Indexed as

DFOExendin-4GLP-1RInsulinomaNODAGAβ-cells

Identifiers

PMID31659487
PMCPMC6522624
OpenAlexW2947984511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.