Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31659469›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of pediatrics2020

The perspectives of parents, general practitioners, and community pharmacists about treating an ill child in primary care: a comparative study.

Sigrid Verhelst, Pauline De Bruyne, Myriam Van Winckel, Koen Boussery, Eline Tommelein

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sigrid VerhelstPharmaceutical Care Unit, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. Sigrid.Verhelst@Ugent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6791-3782
Pauline De BruyneDepartment of Pediatrics and Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Myriam Van WinckelDepartment of Pediatrics and Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Koen BousseryPharmaceutical Care Unit, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Eline TommeleinPharmaceutical Care Unit, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Ghent University · BEGhent University Hospital · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As children are unable to make health-related decisions themselves, parents play a central role in consultations with healthcare providers. Parents' perspectives are therefore the focus of this study. Our first aim was to determine parents' expectations of a healthcare visit with a general practitioner and a community pharmacist. The second aim was to determine the general practitioners' and community pharmacists' perspectives about consultations with children. An observational cross-sectional study was conducted in April and May 2018. We developed three questionnaires: one for parents, one for general practitioners, and one for community pharmacists. The questionnaire for parents was only available through an online platform. The healthcare providers were questioned face-to-face and through an online platform. The study included 380 respondents. Parents considered prescribing or proposing medication the least important action by a general practitioner or community pharmacist, respectively. As well, parents expect information in most cases from both healthcare providers. The questionnaire for general practitioners and community pharmacists revealed that prescribing or proposing medication was regarded the least important action.Conclusion: Considering parents' expectations for a consultation with a general practitioner or community pharmacist, there is a substantial resemblance with the healthcare providers' perspective.What is Known:• The previous studies focusing on parents' perspectives were carried out in a hospital setting or focused on a specific disorder.• Parents consider reassurance and advice from their general practitioner to be very important; the treatment is considered less important.What is New:• Parents considered for both general practitioners' and community pharmacists' verbal information, answers to their questions, and reassurance as more important than receiving pharmacological treatment, while general practitioners and community pharmacists consider prescribing/proposing medication and providing written information as less important.• The expectations of the different groups (parents in relation to not only the healthcare providers but also the general practitioners and community pharmacists compared to each other) know a great resemblance.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to HealthPrimary Health CareProfessional-Family RelationsAdultChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGeneral PractitionersHealth Care SurveysHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle AgedCommunity pharmacistGeneral practitionerPatient-centered carePatient perspectivesPediatricsPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID31659469
OpenAlexW2982361929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.