Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31659425›Full record

ReviewDer Orthopade2019

[Current trends and injuries in cycling: faster, further, e-bike?]

J Hinder, M Jäger

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Orthopade, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J HinderInstitut für Sportmedizin, Universität Münster, Münster, Deutschland.
M JägerLehrstuhl für Orthopädie & Unfallchirurgie, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Klinik für Orthopädie, Unfall- und Wiederherstellungschirurgie, St. Marien-Hospital Mülheim a.d.R. (Contilia), Kaiserstraße 50, 45468, Mülheim/Ruhr, Deutschland. M.Jaeger@contilia.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the past decade, technical innovations (e.g., carbon as a new material, disk brakes, hydraulic shock absorbers, electric transmissions) and lifestyle changes have significantly influenced recreational and professional cycling. In contrast to the past, where ambitious leisure cyclists were primarily interested in the recreational value of nature and landscape, cyclists of all ages are nowadays increasingly focused on performance and self-optimization. Simultaneously, manufacturers have adapted to differing customer requirements: besides the traditional extremities of road and mountain bikes, many specialized models have been designed for special applications: trekking, cyclocross, gravel, full-suspension, single-track, hardtail, downhill, fatbike, etc. For biking fans who are no longer able to meet their own demands due to individual physical restrictions or defined health problems, electric-assist bikes (pedelecs or "e-bikes") were recently introduced. While these are becoming increasingly popular, they have also increased the number of accidents and injuries. The current work provides an update on relevant sport medical and orthopaedic challenges brought on by these developments in cycling.

Indexed as

Athletic InjuriesBicyclingHumansBicyclingElectric bicycleExercise trainingSports injuriesSports medicine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.