ReviewHNO2019
[Studies on radiotherapy of head and neck cancer : Highlights of the 2019 ASCO Annual Meeting].
Review in HNO, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRadiotherapy is an important treatment option in patients with head and neck. At this year's annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Chicago, results of several studies on radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer were presented. MATERIALS AND
methodsAll abstracts and presentations from this year's ASCO Annual Meeting on radiotherapy in patients with head and neck cancer were screened and the most interesting results selected for further review.
resultsThe ORATOR trial compared primary surgery in patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma (OPSCC) with primary radiochemotherapy (RCT), particularly in terms of swallowing, for which superiority of RCT was demonstrated. Furthermore, results were presented on the question of optimal cisplatin dosage in patients receiving adjuvant RCT. Higher cisplatin doses showed better outcome. In patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), neoadjuvant chemotherapy before RCT is a comparable alternative to RCT followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. In addition, results of studies were presented that examined the tolerability of combining immunotherapy with radiotherapy in the first-line setting.
conclusionThe data presented show promising approaches for the further development of radiotherapy, particularly in terms of combined RCT as well as the optimal sequencing and dosing of systemic therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.