Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31659370›Full record

ArticleDer Urologe. Ausg. A2019

[Improvement of vaccination activities in urology].

Peter Schneede

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Viral infections in urology].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter SchneedeUrologische Klinik, Klinikum Memmingen, Lehrkrankenhaus der LMU München, Bismarckstraße 23, 87700, Memmingen, Deutschland. Peter.Schneede@klinikum-memmingen.de.
Kernkraftwerk Gundremmingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective vaccines against various urologically important diseases have been established for a long time, nevertheless, vaccination activities are generally underperformed in urology. Consistently low vaccination rates, e.g. for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines and a widespread vaccination hesitancy characterize the situation especially in men. This article highlights the importance of various aspects of vaccinations in urology and focuses on the improvement of consultation techniques for vaccinations to increase the vaccination rate and acceptance in the future.

Indexed as

Immunization ProgramsPapillomavirus VaccinesVaccination CoverageCancer VaccinesHepatitisHumansMalePapillomavirus InfectionsReferral and ConsultationUrinary Tract InfectionsUrologyVaccinationCancer VaccinesPapillomavirus VaccinesCancer vaccinesHepatitisMumpsTuberculosisUrinary tract infections

Identifiers

PMID31659370
OpenAlexW2982442282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.